Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

If there's no secret, we should never use Basic auth to encode the client_id. #129

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 16, 2023

Conversation

evert
Copy link
Collaborator

@evert evert commented Nov 16, 2023

Fixes #128.

If there's no secret, we should never use Basic auth to encode the client_id.
@evert evert added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 16, 2023
@evert evert self-assigned this Nov 16, 2023
@evert evert merged commit 0562b08 into main Nov 16, 2023
5 checks passed
@evert evert deleted the public-client-id-in-body branch November 16, 2023 11:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Public client without authentication method
1 participant