Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial Setup #1

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Apr 3, 2024
Merged

Initial Setup #1

merged 11 commits into from
Apr 3, 2024

Conversation

haberdashPI
Copy link
Member

@haberdashPI haberdashPI commented Apr 3, 2024

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

docs/fix_doctests.jl Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/fix_doctests.jl Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/make.jl Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/make.jl Show resolved Hide resolved
src/WeakKeyIdDicts.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/runtests.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/runtests.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/runtests.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/runtests.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/runtests.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/WeakKeyIdDicts.jl Show resolved Hide resolved
test/runtests.jl Show resolved Hide resolved

# issue #26939
d26939 = WeakKeyIdDict()
d26939[big"1.0" + 1.1] = 1
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[JuliaFormatter] reported by reviewdog 🐶

Suggested change
d26939[big"1.0" + 1.1] = 1
d26939[big"1.0"+1.1] = 1

Copy link
Member

@ericphanson ericphanson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did not check every line in detail, but as a copy-paste of reviewed code it looks good to me. I think we should also copy all the Base.Iddict tests before making a release, since we should have identical semantics in the case the keys are not GC'd (which we can ensure by keeping a global reference to the keys we test with for example). They deal with a lot of tricky edge cases there that I think would be great to ensure we have tested here. (Not blocking for this PR).

LICENSE.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Eric Hanson <5846501+ericphanson@users.noreply.github.com>
@haberdashPI haberdashPI mentioned this pull request Apr 3, 2024
@haberdashPI haberdashPI merged commit 074331c into main Apr 3, 2024
7 checks passed
@haberdashPI haberdashPI deleted the dfl/initial-setup branch April 3, 2024 20:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants