You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
We are currently working with two types of data: DNA and RNA. To address contamination, we decided to use Decontam with a read count-based approach instead of using blanks.
A month ago, we ran Decontam on our tables and obtained a certain number of contaminants. However, when we ran the same analysis again recently, we observed different results. Specifically, Decontam is now detecting fewer contaminants than it did before.
Could you confirm if there have been any updates or modifications to the code in the past month that might account for this change? We want to ensure that any discrepancies in our results are understood and accounted for.
Thank you for your assistance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
We are currently working with two types of data: DNA and RNA. To address contamination, we decided to use Decontam with a read count-based approach instead of using blanks.
A month ago, we ran Decontam on our tables and obtained a certain number of contaminants. However, when we ran the same analysis again recently, we observed different results. Specifically, Decontam is now detecting fewer contaminants than it did before.
Could you confirm if there have been any updates or modifications to the code in the past month that might account for this change? We want to ensure that any discrepancies in our results are understood and accounted for.
Thank you for your assistance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: