Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 9, 2024. It is now read-only.

fix(mempool): Mark remote txs correctly #1471

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

calbera
Copy link
Contributor

@calbera calbera commented Jan 31, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved error handling in transaction processing for enhanced stability and monitoring.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 31, 2024

Warning

Rate Limit Exceeded

@cyka-bera has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 48 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.
Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.
Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5e3cad1 and 4d97814.

Walkthrough

The recent update to the Mempool type's Insert method in the Cosmos runtime introduces a refined approach to error handling. It modifies how specific errors are processed, including a restructured conditional check for a particular error type and the addition of a new check for any non-nil errors. This enhancement optimizes the control flow within the method, ensuring more robust and precise error handling.

Changes

File Change Summary
cosmos/runtime/.../mempool.go Modified the Insert method to improve error handling by restructuring and adding conditional checks.

🐇✨
In the realm of code, where logic threads weave,
A rabbit hopped in, changes to conceive.
With a flick and a hop, errors now in check,
A smoother flow, with bugs kept in deck.
🚀🌌

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ec7dffc and 5e3cad1.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • cosmos/runtime/txpool/mempool.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
cosmos/runtime/txpool/mempool.go (3)
  • 131-137: The restructuring of the conditional check to handle ethtxpool.ErrAlreadyKnown and increment the telemetry counter is a good improvement. It ensures that transactions already known to the node do not cause CheckTx to fail, which aligns with the intended behavior of not failing CheckTx for known transactions. This change enhances the robustness of the error handling within the Insert method.
  • 138-138: The addition of a new conditional check to handle non-nil errors returned by TxPool.Add is crucial for robust error handling. This ensures that any errors encountered during the insertion of the transaction into the Geth txpool are properly returned, allowing for appropriate handling upstream. This change improves the method's reliability by ensuring that errors are not silently ignored, which is essential for maintaining the integrity of the mempool's operations.
  • 130-138: The modifications made to the Insert method, including the restructuring of an existing conditional check and the addition of a new conditional check for handling non-nil errors, align well with the PR objectives. These changes enhance the error handling and control flow within the method, contributing to the overall stability and reliability of the mempool. The adjustments are well-implemented and address the identified issues effectively.

@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the fix-remote-seen branch May 1, 2024 06:08
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants