Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[deps]: Update ts-jest to v29.2.5 #614

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Sep 16, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
ts-jest (source) 29.1.1 -> 29.2.5 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

kulshekhar/ts-jest (ts-jest)

v29.2.5

Compare Source

v29.2.4

Compare Source

v29.2.3

Compare Source

v29.2.2

Compare Source

v29.2.1

Compare Source

v29.2.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • fix: don't show warning message with Node16/NodeNext (99c4f49), closes #​4266
Features
  • feat(cli): allow migrating cjs presets to transform config (22fb027)
  • feat(presets): add util functions to create ESM presets (06f78ed)
  • feat(presets): add util functions to create CJS presets (f9cc3c0)
Code refactoring
  • refactor: replace lodash deps with native js implementation (40f1708)
  • refactor: use TsJestTransformerOptions type everywhere possibly (7d001be)
  • refactor(cli): use new preset util functions to initialize test config (c2b56ca)
  • refactor(presets): use create preset util functions for cjs presets (922d6d0)
  • test: switch react-app to use Vite (827c8ad)

v29.1.5

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

v29.1.4

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
Features

v29.1.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • add @jest/transform as an optional peer dependency (0ba7f86)
  • bring back Node 14 support (eda56a7)
Performance Improvements
  • remove ts resolved module cache file (4c88da5)

v29.1.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "every 2nd week starting on the 2 week of the year before 4am on Monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner September 16, 2024 01:57
@renovate renovate bot requested a review from addisonbeck September 16, 2024 01:57
@bitwarden-bot bitwarden-bot changed the title [deps]: Update ts-jest to v29.2.5 [PM-12212] [deps]: Update ts-jest to v29.2.5 Sep 16, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (bbc65d7) to head (55a8f04).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main    #614   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   0.00%   0.00%           
=====================================
  Files         58      58           
  Lines       2542    2542           
  Branches     462     462           
=====================================
  Misses      2542    2542           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bitwarden-bot
Copy link

Internal tracking:

@renovate renovate bot changed the title [PM-12212] [deps]: Update ts-jest to v29.2.5 [deps]: Update ts-jest to v29.2.5 Sep 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Detailsa3bd7698-a063-4f0c-b455-865ed24a5d0a

No New Or Fixed Issues Found

@addisonbeck addisonbeck merged commit 0b7c0ec into main Sep 16, 2024
23 checks passed
@addisonbeck addisonbeck deleted the renovate/ts-jest-29.x branch September 16, 2024 12:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants