Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MB-62230: Update VectorIndexReader interface compliant to bleve_index_api@v1.1.12 #24

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 18, 2024

Conversation

abhinavdangeti
Copy link
Member

  • If VectorReaderWithFilter has filterIDs != 1, the document is not eligible while pre-filtering.
  • Also upgrade GO version and workflows.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 9, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 10779419897

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 89.326%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 10290297280: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 477
Relevant Lines: 534

💛 - Coveralls

+ If VectorReaderWithFilter has filterIDs != 1, the document is not
  eligible while pre-filtering.
+ Also upgrade GO version and workflows.
@abhinavdangeti abhinavdangeti changed the title Update VectorIndexReader interface compliant to bleve_index_api@v1.1.12 MB-62230: Update VectorIndexReader interface compliant to bleve_index_api@v1.1.12 Sep 9, 2024
@abhinavdangeti
Copy link
Member Author

@metonymic-smokey must include this change as well while absorbing bleve_index_api@v1.1.2 into couchbase/n1fty.

@abhinavdangeti abhinavdangeti merged commit 992ac44 into master Sep 18, 2024
10 checks passed
@abhinavdangeti abhinavdangeti deleted the mb62230_apichange branch September 18, 2024 16:08
@abhinavdangeti
Copy link
Member Author

Available with blevesearch/sear@v0.2.9

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants