Add license scan report and status #134
Conversation
Signed off by: fossabot <badges@fossa.com>
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
WalkthroughThe changes in the pull request involve updates to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant README
User->>README: View README.md
README->>User: Display project information
README->>User: Show FOSSA status badge (small)
README->>User: Show FOSSA status badge (large)
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
439-439: Consider maintaining consistent heading style.The document uses a mix of setext (underlined) and atx (#) heading styles. Consider using setext style consistently throughout the document to match the existing headings.
-## License -------------🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
439-439: Expected: setext; Actual: atx
Heading style(MD003, heading-style)
439-439: null
Multiple headings with the same content(MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
README.md
439-439: Expected: setext; Actual: atx
Heading style
(MD003, heading-style)
439-439: null
Multiple headings with the same content
(MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)
8-8: LGTM! Badge placement and formatting are consistent.
The FOSSA status badge is well-placed and follows the existing badge styling pattern.
439-440: LGTM! License section addition is valuable.
The addition of a dedicated License section with the larger FOSSA badge improves the visibility of license compliance status, which is crucial for open source projects.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.35.0)
439-439: Expected: setext; Actual: atx
Heading style
(MD003, heading-style)
439-439: null
Multiple headings with the same content
(MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
Your FOSSA integration was successful! Attached in this PR is a badge and license report to track scan status in your README.
Below are docs for integrating FOSSA license checks into your CI:
Summary by CodeRabbit