Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support TxDAG generation for op-geth; #149

Closed
wants to merge 33 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

galaio
Copy link
Collaborator

@galaio galaio commented Aug 23, 2024

Description

The implementation of BEP-396: Accelerate Block Execution by TxDAG.

Changes

Notable changes:

  • txdag: the initial the TxDAG commit;
  • ...

galaio and others added 27 commits September 23, 2024 14:31
txdag: opt rw record flag;

txdag: fix some broken UTs;

txdag: opt some logic;
evm: fix failed tx rwSet collecting;
mvstates: opt async dep generation;
mvstates: opt resolve dep logic;
mvstates: fix async dep gen deadlock issue;
miner: support record sysytem tx rwset;
miner: opt txdag enable checking;
txdag: fix system tx finalise issue;
mvstate: using pending writes to accelerate txdag generation;
txdag: test snappy compress ratio;
txdag: add more bench tests;
txdag: reduce mem alloc and async resolve tx dependency;
txdag: add excluded flag;
mvstates: generate txdag with excluded flag;
txdag: support multi flags, and supported in pevm;
txdag: opt TxDAG rwset collecting & generating;
txdag: opt txdag encoding, reduce rlp size
* txDAG transfer

* encode/decode txDAG data with ABI

* set txDAG receiver to a special address

---------

Co-authored-by: andyzhang2023 <andyzhang2023@gmail.com>

merge conflict

fix conflict
mvstates: support txdepMap to produce txdag;
mvststes: using struct in rwset;
txdag: refactor async logic, reduce concurrent logic;

txdag: using slice cache rather than sending chan directly;

txdag: opt gc issue;

txdag: support init cache pool;
worker: add UT to test txdag gasless block generation;
@welkin22
Copy link
Contributor

welkin22 commented Nov 5, 2024

Just need to directly review #187, I will close this PR.

@welkin22 welkin22 closed this Nov 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants