chore: implement OpenSeaWrapper and OpenSeaWrapperFactory contracts

[levalleux-ludo]

Description

• OpenSeaWrapper got from https://github.com/bosonprotocol/boson-protocol-contracts/blob/openSeaWrapper/contracts/example/Wrappers/OpenSeaWrapper.sol
  with main difference is that constant environment configuration (seaport address, ...) has been replaced with constructor arguments (to allow running on dummy environments).

• Now an OpenSeaWrapperFactory allows a user to create a wrapper for an existing voucher contract. Only the seller (assistant or admin) is allowed to create such a wrapper for one of their voucher contracts.

TO BE DECIDED: If the OpenSeaWrapper and OpenSeaWrapperFactory contracts code stay in the core-components repo or will be moved to the protocol-contracts one.

How to test

A few tests have been created to check the factory:

cd contracts
npm ci
npx hardhat test

[zajck]

TO BE DECIDED: If the OpenSeaWrapper and OpenSeaWrapperFactory contracts code stay in the core-components repo or will be moved to the protocol-contracts one.

At some point they will for sure become a part of the protocol-contracts repo. You can even move them to examples already if you wish (examples are not audited).
But if it's more convenient for testing, you can leave them here for now.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.45455% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 90.03%. Comparing base (7cbdbb0) to head (3cece54).
Report is 61 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
packages/core-sdk/src/marketplaces/opensea.ts	95.04%	5 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #721      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.47%   90.03%   +0.56%     
==========================================
  Files         163      163              
  Lines        5893     6004     +111     
  Branches      889      910      +21     
==========================================
+ Hits         5273     5406     +133     
+ Misses        620      598      -22     

Flag	Coverage Δ
common	92.11% <100.00%> (-3.54%)	⬇️
core-sdk	57.90% <23.30%> (-0.60%)	⬇️
e2e	86.58% <95.45%> (+0.63%)	⬆️
eth-connect-sdk	97.33% <ø> (ø)
ethers-sdk	70.03% <ø> (ø)
ipfs-storage	90.90% <ø> (ø)
metadata	94.70% <ø> (ø)
unittests	61.55% <28.18%> (-0.59%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[zajck]

Just a note - I have in my backlog to do a security analysis, whether approve for all is safe or should approval be done per tokenId.