Mark failing napari tests as xfail #213
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: Alessandro Felder <alessandrofelder@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Alessandro Felder <alessandrofelder@users.noreply.github.com>
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
alessandrofelder
approved these changes
Aug 7, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Before submitting a pull request (PR), please read the contributing guide.
Please fill out as much of this template as you can, but if you have any problems or questions, just leave a comment and we will help out :)
Description
What is this PR
Why is this PR needed?
Tests are failing due to an error in the teardown of the
make_napari_viewerfixture.What does this PR do?
Marks tests with xfail.
References
brainglobe/cellfinder#443
How has this PR been tested?
All tests pass locally in a fresh environment.
Is this a breaking change?
No
Does this PR require an update to the documentation?
No
Checklist: