Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

codecs: skip installation when running an offline install #1812

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 2, 2023

Conversation

ogayot
Copy link
Member

@ogayot ogayot commented Sep 29, 2023

ubuntu-restricted-addons is a multiverse package and is not included in the pool. Therefore, trying to get it installed when offline leads to an obvious error.

Instead of making the whole Ubuntu installation fail, we now warn and skip installation of the package when performing an offline install. In a perfect world, we should not have offered to install the package in the first place, but in practice, we can run an offline installation as the result of failed mirror testing (bad network for instance).

NOTE: I've reused what I did for #1795 so no wonder if the code looks similar :)

ubuntu-restricted-addons is a multiverse package and is not included in
the pool. Therefore, trying to get it installed when offline leads to an
obvious error.

Instead of making the whole Ubuntu installation fail, we now warn and
skip installation of the package when performing an offline install.
In a perfect world, we should not have offered to install the package in
the first place, but in practice, we can run an offline installation as
the result of failed mirror testing (bad network for instance).

Signed-off-by: Olivier Gayot <olivier.gayot@canonical.com>
@ogayot ogayot merged commit bd52c48 into canonical:main Oct 2, 2023
11 checks passed
@ogayot ogayot deleted the install-package-skip-offline branch October 2, 2023 07:14
@ogayot ogayot mentioned this pull request Oct 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants