Skip to content

carcruz97/LayoutLM-Form-Understanding---Sequence-Labeling

 
 

Repository files navigation

LayoutLM

Fine-tuning Example

We evaluate LayoutLM on several document image understanding datasets, and it outperforms several SOTA pre-trained models and approaches.

Setup environment as follows:

conda create -n layoutlm python=3.6
conda activate layoutlm
conda install pytorch==1.4.0 cudatoolkit=10.1 -c pytorch
git clone https://github.com/NVIDIA/apex && cd apex
pip install -v --no-cache-dir --global-option="--cpp_ext" --global-option="--cuda_ext" ./
pip install .
## For development mode
# pip install -e ".[dev]"

Sequence Labeling Task

We give a fine-tuning example for sequence labeling tasks. You can run this example on FUNSD, a dataset for document understanding tasks.

First, we need to preprocess the JSON file into txt. You can run the preprocessing scripts funsd_preprocess.py in the scripts directory. For more options, please refer to the arguments.

cd examples/seq_labeling
./preprocess.sh

After preprocessing, run LayoutLM as follows:

python run_seq_labeling.py  --data_dir data \
                            --model_type layoutlm \
                            --model_name_or_path path/to/pretrained/model/directory \
                            --do_lower_case \
                            --max_seq_length 512 \
                            --do_train \
                            --num_train_epochs 100.0 \
                            --logging_steps 10 \
                            --save_steps -1 \
                            --output_dir path/to/output/directory \
                            --labels data/labels.txt \
                            --per_gpu_train_batch_size 16 \
                            --per_gpu_eval_batch_size 16 \
                            --fp16

Prediction on a new Image

Import the module custom_preprocess.py
Pass the image to custom_img_annotation_.write_annoteFile() for preprocessing the new image.
Calling custom_img_annotation_.convert() and custom_img_annotation_.seg() will proce the test.txt file required by layoutLm model for prediction.

After the preprocessing, run layoutlm using --dopredict method as follows.

python run_seq_labeling.py  --do_predict \
                            --data_dir data \
                            --model_type layoutlm \
                            --model_name_or_path output \
                            --do_lower_case \
                            --output_dir output \
                            --labels data/labels.txt \
                            --fp16

Results

SROIE (field-level)

Model Hmean
BERT-Large 90.99%
RoBERTa-Large 92.80%
Ranking 1st in SROIE 94.02%
LayoutLM 96.04%

RVL-CDIP

Model Accuracy
BERT-Large 89.92%
RoBERTa-Large 90.11%
VGG-16 (Afzal et al., 2017) 90.97%
Stacked CNN Ensemble (Das et al., 2018) 92.21%
LadderNet (Sarkhel & Nandi, 2019) 92.77%
Multimodal Ensemble (Dauphinee et al., 2019) 93.07%
LayoutLM 94.42%

FUNSD (field-level)

Model Precision Recall F1
BERT-Large 0.6113 0.7085 0.6563
RoBERTa-Large 0.6780 0.7391 0.7072
LayoutLM 0.7677 0.8195 0.7927

Citation

If you find LayoutLM useful in your research, please cite the following paper:

@misc{xu2019layoutlm,
    title={LayoutLM: Pre-training of Text and Layout for Document Image Understanding},
    author={Yiheng Xu and Minghao Li and Lei Cui and Shaohan Huang and Furu Wei and Ming Zhou},
    year={2019},
    eprint={1912.13318},
    archivePrefix={arXiv},
    primaryClass={cs.CL}
}

License

This project is licensed under the license found in the LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree. Portions of the source code are based on the transformers project. Microsoft Open Source Code of Conduct

Contact Information

For help or issues using LayoutLM, please submit a GitHub issue.

For other communications related to LayoutLM, please contact Lei Cui (lecu@microsoft.com), Furu Wei (fuwei@microsoft.com).

About

Intelligence Extract - NLP - CV

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages

  • Jupyter Notebook 78.8%
  • Python 21.0%
  • Shell 0.2%