Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement III] Swap to um for depth #18

Merged
merged 54 commits into from
Jul 19, 2024
Merged

[Enhancement III] Swap to um for depth #18

merged 54 commits into from
Jul 19, 2024

Conversation

CodyCBakerPhD
Copy link
Member

@CodyCBakerPhD CodyCBakerPhD commented Jun 27, 2024

Just a reminder that the long term plan is to separate these variable depth types into a separate extension that depends on this one; it's just easier to develop/debug with them all in the same place at the moment

Swapping from units mm to um since that seems to be a more standard unit of measure for depth

@CodyCBakerPhD CodyCBakerPhD self-assigned this Jun 27, 2024
@CodyCBakerPhD CodyCBakerPhD changed the title [Enhancement IV] Swap to um for depth [Enhancement III] Swap to um for depth Jul 12, 2024
Base automatically changed from all_previous_prs_and_variable_depth_static to main July 19, 2024 14:00
@CodyCBakerPhD CodyCBakerPhD marked this pull request as ready for review July 19, 2024 14:02
@CodyCBakerPhD
Copy link
Member Author

@alessandratrapani Small adjustment to units for variable depth field

Copy link
Collaborator

@alessandratrapani alessandratrapani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok! I double-checked, and they should have all been replaced

@CodyCBakerPhD CodyCBakerPhD merged commit eea8167 into main Jul 19, 2024
33 checks passed
@CodyCBakerPhD CodyCBakerPhD deleted the swap_to_um branch July 19, 2024 14:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants