Intrinsic signal imaging #10
Conversation
src/schneider_lab_to_nwb/schneider_2024/schneider_2024_intrinsic_signal_imaging_interface.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| name: intrinsic_signal_optical_imaging | ||
| description: For precise targeting of auditory cortex, intrinsic optical imaging (IOS) will be performed using a 2-photon microscope (Neurolabware). The skull is first bilaterally thinned over a region of interest (ROI) and made translucent. On experiment day, 680nm red light (ThorLabs) is used to image the ROI. Data is collected via MATLAB running custom suites for online and offline analyses. | ||
| Images: | ||
| name: images |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This does not follow the naming convention for the types, right?
https://nwbinspector.readthedocs.io/en/dev/best_practices/general.html#naming-conventions
Is that intentional? I am missing something?
Same for the processed image
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There is some open discussion on this: rly/ndx-pose#31
And given all the considerations mentioned on that issue, I think snake_case is the more appropriate/intuitive choice for naming, so I'm going to stick with it for this conversion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't have a horse in this race but maybe it is important for you to know (or remember?) that when we discussed this in the LBNL - CN meeting Ben was very strong against changing the best practice and we did not come to any conclusion about it but Ryan promised to write some modified best practices. Maybe something to bring up again.
src/schneider_lab_to_nwb/schneider_2024/schneider_2024_intrinsic_signal_imaging_interface.py
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/schneider_lab_to_nwb/schneider_2024/schneider_2024_intrinsic_signal_imaging_interface.py
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Yes, thanks for the suggestion. |
This PR adds intrinsic signal imaging, which is used to guide the ephys probe placement