-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor/on click #254
Refactor/on click #254
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update refactors several Elm modules to simplify event handling and improve code consistency. Key changes include the addition and reordering of message types in Changes
Sequence DiagramssequenceDiagram
participant User
participant App
participant Messages
participant Update
participant View
User->>View: Clicks Link
View->>Messages: LinkClicked
Messages->>Update: Update with LinkClicked Msg
Update->>Messages: UrlChanged Msg
Messages->>App: Handle UrlChanged
App->>View: Render new view
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ColorSelector
participant HtmlEvents
User->>ColorSelector: Clicks Color Option
ColorSelector->>HtmlEvents: onClick Event
HtmlEvents-->>ColorSelector: Event Handled
ColorSelector->>User: Color Option Selected
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
elm.json
is excluded by!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (11)
- src/App/Messages.elm (1 hunks)
- src/App/Update.elm (4 hunks)
- src/App/View.elm (4 hunks)
- src/Lib/ColorSelector.elm (2 hunks)
- src/Lib/Frame.elm (1 hunks)
- src/Lib/Html.elm (2 hunks)
- src/Main.elm (1 hunks)
- src/Page/Calc.elm (1 hunks)
- src/Page/Lissajous.elm (4 hunks)
- src/Page/Maze.elm (3 hunks)
- src/Page/Physics.elm (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- src/Lib/Frame.elm
- src/Lib/Html.elm
- src/Page/Calc.elm
- src/Page/Physics.elm
Additional comments not posted (14)
src/Main.elm (2)
7-7
: LGTM! The import statement is updated correctly.The
init
function is now correctly imported fromApp.Update
.
Line range hint
13-22
:
LGTM! Themain
function is updated correctly.The
main
function now uses theinit
function fromApp.Update
, aligning with the refactoring changes.src/App/Messages.elm (1)
27-28
: Verify the removal ofGoToHome
andGoToPage
variants.The
Msg
type changes look good. Ensure thatGoToHome
andGoToPage
variants are not used elsewhere in the codebase.Verification successful
Verified the removal of
GoToHome
andGoToPage
variants.The
Msg
type changes are confirmed. TheGoToHome
andGoToPage
variants are not used elsewhere in the codebase.
- No occurrences of
GoToHome
andGoToPage
found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `GoToHome` and `GoToPage` variants are not used elsewhere. # Test: Search for the usage of `GoToHome` and `GoToPage`. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type elm 'GoToHome|GoToPage'Length of output: 35
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Double-check the absence of `GoToHome` and `GoToPage` variants in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `GoToHome` and `GoToPage` in Elm files. rg --type elm 'GoToHome' rg --type elm 'GoToPage'Length of output: 49
src/Lib/ColorSelector.elm (2)
8-8
: LGTM! The import statement is updated correctly.The
onClick
event is now correctly imported, aligning with the updated event handling logic.
22-22
: LGTM! Theview
function is updated correctly.The
view
function now uses theonClick
event, aligning with the updated event handling logic.src/App/Update.elm (2)
141-153
: LGTM! Theinit
function is updated correctly.The
init
function replacesinitialModel
, aligning with the updated initialization logic.
31-113
: LGTM! Theupdate
function is updated correctly.The
update
function now handles URL changes and updates to various pages, aligning with the updated message handling logic.src/App/View.elm (2)
7-7
: Verify the removal of onClick import.The
onClick
import has been removed, ensure that this removal does not affect the event handling functionality in theview
function.Verification successful
Removal of
onClick
import is safe.The
onClick
import has been removed fromsrc/App/View.elm
, and there is no usage ofonClick
in this file, so this change does not affect the functionality.
- No action needed for
onClick
import removal insrc/App/View.elm
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the removal of `onClick` import does not affect functionality. # Test: Search for `onClick` usage in the codebase. Expect: No usage of `onClick`. rg --type elm -A 5 $'onClick'Length of output: 9607
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if `onClick` is used in `src/App/View.elm`. # Test: Search for `onClick` usage in `src/App/View.elm`. rg --type elm -A 5 $'onClick' src/App/View.elmLength of output: 45
36-36
: LGTM! But verify the functionality.The changes in the
view
function look good. Ensure that the new class attributes and HTML structure work as expected.src/Page/Lissajous.elm (3)
117-117
: LGTM! But verify the functionality.The use of
always
in theinit
function is correct and consistent. Ensure that this change does not affect the functionality.Verification successful
LGTM! The use of
always
in theinit
function is correct and consistent.
- The
createBoundedArray
function usesalways
consistently across the codebase.- This change does not affect the functionality.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the functionality of the `init` function. # Test: Search for the `init` function usage in the codebase. Expect: No issues with the new implementation. rg --type elm -A 5 $'init'Length of output: 19474
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage and impact of `createBoundedArray` with `always` in the codebase. # Search for the usage of `createBoundedArray` to ensure its correct usage with `always`. rg --type elm -A 5 'createBoundedArray'Length of output: 2605
329-334
: LGTM! But verify the functionality.The use of
onClickPreventDefaultAndStopPropagation
in theview
function is correct and consistent. Ensure that this change does not affect the functionality.Verification successful
Functionality Verified!
The use of
onClickPreventDefaultAndStopPropagation
in theview
function is correct and consistent. There are no issues found with its implementation or usage.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the functionality of the `view` function. # Test: Search for the `view` function usage in the codebase. Expect: No issues with the new implementation. rg --type elm -A 5 $'view'Length of output: 17013
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition and usage of `onClickPreventDefaultAndStopPropagation` in the codebase. # Search for the definition of `onClickPreventDefaultAndStopPropagation` rg --type elm 'onClickPreventDefaultAndStopPropagation' # Search for the usage of `onClickPreventDefaultAndStopPropagation` in the codebase. rg --type elm 'onClickPreventDefaultAndStopPropagation' -A 5Length of output: 2783
12-12
: Verify the addition of onClickPreventDefaultAndStopPropagation import.The
onClickPreventDefaultAndStopPropagation
import has been added. Ensure that this addition is used correctly in theview
function.Verification successful
Verified the addition of onClickPreventDefaultAndStopPropagation import.
The
onClickPreventDefaultAndStopPropagation
import has been added and is used correctly within theview
function in thesrc/Page/Lissajous.elm
file.
- Correct usage of
onClickPreventDefaultAndStopPropagation
forStart
,Stop
, andReset
actions.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `onClickPreventDefaultAndStopPropagation` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `onClickPreventDefaultAndStopPropagation` in the codebase. Expect: Correct usage in the `view` function. rg --type elm -A 5 $'onClickPreventDefaultAndStopPropagation'Length of output: 1985
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the `view` function from the `src/Page/Lissajous.elm` file to verify the usage of `onClickPreventDefaultAndStopPropagation`. # Test: Extract the `view` function and its context from the `src/Page/Lissajous.elm` file. ast-grep --lang elm --pattern $'view : $_ -> $_\nview $_ =\n $$$' src/Page/Lissajous.elmLength of output: 195
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the `view` function in the `src/Page/Lissajous.elm` file and include surrounding lines to review the context. # Test: Search for the `view` function and its context in the `src/Page/Lissajous.elm` file. rg --type elm -A 20 'view : ' src/Page/Lissajous.elmLength of output: 1071
src/Page/Maze.elm (2)
10-10
: Verify the retention of onClick import.The
onClick
import has been retained. Ensure that this retention is consistent with the changes in thecontrolView
function.Verification successful
Retention of onClick import is consistent.
The
onClick
import has been retained and is actively used in multiple locations withinsrc/Page/Maze.elm
. This retention is consistent with the changes in thecontrolView
function and other parts of the file.
src/Page/Maze.elm
: Multiple usages ofonClick
confirmed.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `onClick` in the `controlView` function. # Test: Search for the usage of `onClick` in the codebase. Expect: Consistent usage in the `controlView` function. rg --type elm -A 5 $'onClick'Length of output: 9607
457-512
: LGTM! But verify the functionality.The use of
onClick
in thecontrolView
function is correct and consistent. Ensure that this change does not affect the functionality.Verification successful
LGTM! But verify the functionality.
The use of
onClick
in thecontrolView
function is correct and consistent across bothsrc/Page/Maze.elm
andsrc/Page/Physics.elm
. Ensure that this change does not affect the functionality.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the functionality of the `controlView` function. # Test: Search for the `controlView` function usage in the codebase. Expect: No issues with the new implementation. rg --type elm -A 5 $'controlView'Length of output: 1630
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the `onClick` handlers in `controlView` function in both `src/Page/Maze.elm` and `src/Page/Physics.elm`. # Test: Search for `onClick` handlers in `controlView` function in `src/Page/Maze.elm`. rg --type elm -A 5 'onClick' src/Page/Maze.elm # Test: Search for `onClick` handlers in `controlView` function in `src/Page/Physics.elm`. rg --type elm -A 5 'onClick' src/Page/Physics.elmLength of output: 4440
Improves the navigation, routing and propagation of messages in the application, and in particular attempts to bypass issue elm/browser#34.