Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: more consistent params in Broker API #5342

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

j4m1ef0rd
Copy link
Contributor

Pull Request

Checklist

Please conduct a thorough self-review before opening the PR.

  • I am confident that the code works.
  • I have written sufficient tests.
  • I have written and tested required migrations.
  • I have updated documentation where appropriate.

Summary

Small PR to address the consistency issues in the broker API that crumps raised

@j4m1ef0rd j4m1ef0rd requested a review from dandanlen October 22, 2024 04:03
@j4m1ef0rd j4m1ef0rd self-assigned this Oct 22, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 71%. Comparing base (df8771a) to head (7374cc2).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
api/lib/src/lib.rs 0% 5 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##            main   #5342    +/-   ##
======================================
- Coverage     71%     71%    -0%     
======================================
  Files        492     492            
  Lines      85750   85614   -136     
  Branches   85750   85614   -136     
======================================
- Hits       61107   60916   -191     
- Misses     21908   21961    +53     
- Partials    2735    2737     +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@j4m1ef0rd j4m1ef0rd added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 23, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 6311f8c Oct 23, 2024
48 of 49 checks passed
@j4m1ef0rd j4m1ef0rd deleted the chore/broker-api-params branch October 23, 2024 04:49
syan095 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
* origin/main:
  feat: Submit a slot number alongside nonce (#5297)
  chore: use node version from `.nvmrc` 📌 (#5336)
  chore: add engine account_info logging (#5347)
  chore: replace manual scale encoding for ts-scale (#5335)
  chore: more consistent params in Broker API (#5342)

# Conflicts:
#	engine/src/witness/sol.rs
#	state-chain/pallets/cf-elections/Cargo.toml
#	state-chain/runtime/Cargo.toml
syan095 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
…waps-close-accounts

* origin/main: (44 commits)
  fix: expire all previous epochs (#5279)
  feat: add/update contract swaps parameters (#5343)
  chore: add address to solana logging (#5353)
  fix: ignore dust underflows in order fills rpc (#5352)
  chore: consistent naming prewitnessed (#5351)
  feat: engine-runner verifies gpg signature of old dylib when downloaded (#5339)
  feat: tainted transaction reporting (#5310)
  bug: change_utxo not always present (#5340)
  feat: structured error return types for rpcs (#5346)
  chore: unify dependencies to root cargo.toml (#5333)
  feat: Submit a slot number alongside nonce (#5297)
  chore: use node version from `.nvmrc` 📌 (#5336)
  chore: add engine account_info logging (#5347)
  chore: replace manual scale encoding for ts-scale (#5335)
  chore: more consistent params in Broker API (#5342)
  feat: broker can encode btc smart contract call (#5329)
  chore: localnet recreate script can use defaults (#5338)
  feat: witnessing btc smart contract swaps (#5331)
  feat: Solana CCM fallback (#5316)
  fix: scale types for pending ceremonies (#5286)
  ...

# Conflicts:
#	Cargo.lock
#	state-chain/chains/src/sol/api.rs
#	state-chain/pallets/cf-broadcast/src/migrations.rs
#	state-chain/pallets/cf-environment/Cargo.toml
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants