feat: runtime metadata hash verification

[ramizhasan111]

Pull Request

Closes: PRO-1733

Checklist

Please conduct a thorough self-review before opening the PR.

• I am confident that the code works.
• I have written sufficient tests.
• I have written and tested required migrations.
• I have updated documentation where appropriate.

Summary

Please include a succinct description of the purpose and content of the PR. What problem does it solve, and how? Link issues, discussions, other PRs, and anything else that will help the reviewer.

Non-Breaking changes

If this PR includes non-breaking changes, select the non-breaking label. On merge, CI will automatically cherry-pick the commit to a PR against the release branch.

[dandanlen]

It would be nice to have a bouncer test that uses the metadata hash - we can add this separately.

[ramizhasan111]

It would be nice to have a bouncer test that uses the metadata hash - we can add this separately.

Yes, that would be nice.
I did test it locally on a localnet enabling the metadata hash verification for engine state chain client and providing the metadata hash in the engine. Works fine 👌

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 72%. Comparing base (d12200a) to head (8e3fcee).
Report is 12 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../client/extrinsic_api/signed/submission_watcher.rs	0%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##            main   #5467    +/-   ##
======================================
- Coverage     72%     72%    -0%     
======================================
  Files        494     495     +1     
  Lines      87751   88004   +253     
  Branches   87751   88004   +253     
======================================
+ Hits       62826   62971   +145     
- Misses     22310   22453   +143     
+ Partials    2615    2580    -35     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[dandanlen]

LGTM - I couldn't resist the urge to sort the dependencies though 🙈

Also, just confirm - right now we never build the runtime with the extension enabled. I expect that we want to add this to the release or production profile at some point. I think we can discuss this later depending on product / testing concerns.