Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Look for smelly selectors #1074

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2024
Merged

Look for smelly selectors #1074

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2024

Conversation

prymitive
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This pull request was validated by pint.

✔️ No problems found

Stats

Stat Value
Version v0.64.0-27-g9b01f7f
Number of rules parsed 4
Number of rules checked 0
Number of problems found 0
Number of offline checks 0
Number of online checks 0
Checks duration 0

Problems

No problems reported

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 16, 2024

Benchmark diff:

goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: github.com/cloudflare/pint/cmd/pint
cpu: AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor                
              │   old.txt   │              new.txt               │
              │   sec/op    │   sec/op     vs base               │
FindEntries-4   39.23m ± 1%   39.12m ± 6%       ~ (p=0.631 n=10)
CheckRules-4     8.501 ± 2%    8.509 ± 2%       ~ (p=0.912 n=10)
geomean         577.5m        577.0m       -0.09%

              │   old.txt    │               new.txt               │
              │     B/op     │     B/op      vs base               │
FindEntries-4   27.41Mi ± 0%   27.41Mi ± 0%       ~ (p=0.579 n=10)
CheckRules-4    978.3Mi ± 0%   978.6Mi ± 0%       ~ (p=0.165 n=10)
geomean         163.7Mi        163.8Mi       +0.02%

              │   old.txt   │              new.txt               │
              │  allocs/op  │  allocs/op   vs base               │
FindEntries-4   131.9k ± 0%   131.9k ± 0%       ~ (p=0.358 n=10)
CheckRules-4    14.18M ± 0%   14.19M ± 0%       ~ (p=0.190 n=10)
geomean         1.368M        1.368M       +0.01%

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.78%. Comparing base (f363eef) to head (9b01f7f).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1074   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.77%   94.78%           
=======================================
  Files          99       99           
  Lines        9988    10004   +16     
=======================================
+ Hits         9466     9482   +16     
  Misses        366      366           
  Partials      156      156           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@prymitive prymitive merged commit 1786c76 into main Aug 16, 2024
20 checks passed
@prymitive prymitive deleted the promql/regexp branch August 16, 2024 13:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants