-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 452
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
db: ensure checkpointed database with WAL failover is openable
This commit adapts Checkpoint to omit the [WAL Failover] section of the OPTIONS file from the checkpoint's OPTIONS file. The WAL failover configuration is specific to the original database. We want our checkpoints to be fully encapsulated and complete, so we copy WAL files from both the primary WAL directory and the failover secondary. This means a database opening the checkpoint does not need the secondary directory to be provided as a WALRecoveryDir. With this commit, Checkpoint parses the old OPTIONS file and copies its contents verbatim to a new file in the checkpointed directory. If the old OPTIONS file had a WAL Failover configuration, its entire section is commented out within the checkpoint.
- Loading branch information
Showing
9 changed files
with
623 additions
and
68 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.