Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow additional Popen arguments through task.run #577

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 8, 2023

Conversation

cottsay
Copy link
Member

@cottsay cottsay commented Aug 30, 2023

This is a follow-up to #411, which made the same change to subprocess.run, which this function calls.

This is a follow-up to b6c977a, which
made the same change to subprocess.run, which this function calls.
@cottsay cottsay added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 30, 2023
@cottsay cottsay self-assigned this Aug 30, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@nuclearsandwich nuclearsandwich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Solidly more flexible!

@cottsay cottsay merged commit 3cab805 into master Sep 8, 2023
33 checks passed
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the cottsay/popen-args branch September 8, 2023 15:27
@pablogs9
Copy link

Hello @cottsay, I'm having some issues with the micro-ROS CI. At first glance, I guess that it may be related to this PR:

https://github.com/micro-ROS/micro_ros_setup/actions/runs/6141791063/job/16662914677

Could you confirm that this inner SyntaxError: invalid syntax inside colcon_core can be related to this so we can start investigating somewhere?

@cottsay
Copy link
Member Author

cottsay commented Sep 12, 2023

@pablogs9 - The first occurrence of that pattern was over 24 hrs before this change was even merged.

Also, I believe ros-tooling/setup-ros uses the released versions of colcon packages, not the development tip.

@pablogs9
Copy link

Thanks, @cottsay, I will investigate further.

@cottsay cottsay added this to the 0.13.0 milestone Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants