Add urdf-parser-py and torchkin

[Tobias-Fischer]

Checklist

• Title of this PR is meaningful: e.g. "Adding my_nifty_package", not "updated meta.yaml".
• License file is packaged (see here for an example).
• Source is from official source.
• Package does not vendor other packages. (If a package uses the source of another package, they should be separate packages or the licenses of all packages need to be packaged).
• If static libraries are linked in, the license of the static library is packaged.
• Package does not ship static libraries. If static libraries are needed, follow CFEP-18.
• Build number is 0.
• A tarball (url) rather than a repo (e.g. git_url) is used in your recipe (see here for more details).
• GitHub users listed in the maintainer section have posted a comment confirming they are willing to be listed there.
• When in trouble, please check our knowledge base documentation before pinging a team.

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/urdf-parser-py) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/urdf-parser-py:

• noarch: python recipes are required to have a lower bound on the python version. Typically this means putting python >=3.6 in both host and run but you should check upstream for the package's Python compatibility.

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/torchkin, recipes/urdf-parser-py) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/urdf-parser-py:

• noarch: python recipes are required to have a lower bound on the python version. Typically this means putting python >=3.6 in both host and run but you should check upstream for the package's Python compatibility.

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/torchkin, recipes/urdf-parser-py) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[Tobias-Fischer]

Hi @conda-forge/help-python - this is ready for review. It adds another required package for conda-forge/theseus-ai-feedstock#7 (@ocefpaf already kindly merged #23199).

/cc @traversaro - this adds urdf-parser-py, which is also packaged by ROS.

PS: As package is python: noarch, the passing linux build is sufficient.

[Tobias-Fischer]

Many thanks, that was quick @ocefpaf :)

[traversaro]

The urdf_parser_py Python module was also packaged as part of the urdfdom-py Python package in #21870 (the naming was choosen for consistency with ROS/package.xml metadata). Probably we may want to make the two package converge.

[Tobias-Fischer]

Ah, damn .. apologies for that! I should have dug deeper :(

I requested to archive the urdf-parser-py feedstock here: conda-forge/admin-requests#744
At least then we will have some visibility for the future.

[traversaro]

Ah, damn .. apologies for that! I should have dug deeper :(

No problem, the whole different naming between the package and the module is quite confusing. Furthermore, the package on PyPI is stuck to quite an old version, but that is another story.