-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
EC - check of peak energy #12
Comments
Can we close this? It's been a while since we get a good agreement for all the EC cases... |
I updated the old notebook in PR #94 reruning it with the current code. |
In https://github.com/jsitarek/agnpy/blob/master/tests/basic/simple_ec.ipynb I put a few tests of the EC code comparing it with back of the envelope calculations.
in [15] (test2) compares the peak energy of the EC spectrum for Thomson case without beaming, there is a factor of 3.3 difference here, out of which I can understand a factor of 2
in [22] (test3) there is the same check done in K-N regime (still without beaming), here the values match (but they are also limitted by a somewhat different process)
in [26] (test4) the same is done for Thomson regime but with strong beaming, the difference is smaller in this case ~ 1.3, maybe good enough?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: