feat: get keyring backend #11484
Merged
feat: get keyring backend #11484
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
fedekunze
added
C:Keys
|
@mergify backport release/v0.46.x |
mergify bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2022
## Description This PR introduces a getter for the keyring backend type used in the keyring config. This is useful to disable endpoints whenever the keyring `test` backend is used. This is a workaround since the SDK keyring dependency doesn't support locking accounts. See 99designs/keyring#85 for context. Attack on ethereum that affects Ethermint chain validators/nodes using `keyring_backend=test`, making their funds remotely accessible via `eth_sendTransaction` https://blog.ethereum.org/2015/08/29/security-alert-insecurely-configured-geth-can-make-funds-remotely-accessible/ --- ### Author Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and please add links to any relevant follow up issues.* I have... - [x] included the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [x] targeted the correct branch (see [PR Targeting](https://github.com/cosmos/cosmos-sdk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pr-targeting)) - [x] provided a link to the relevant issue or specification - [x] reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary - [x] confirmed all CI checks have passed ### Reviewers Checklist *All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.* I have... - [ ] confirmed the correct [type prefix](https://github.com/commitizen/conventional-commit-types/blob/v3.0.0/index.json) in the PR title - [ ] confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed - [ ] confirmed that this PR does not change production code (cherry picked from commit 2083bc8)
✅ Backports have been created
Hey, I reacted but my real name is @Mergifyio |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR introduces a getter for the keyring backend type used in the keyring config. This is useful to disable endpoints whenever the keyring
testbackend is used. This is a workaround since the SDK keyring dependency doesn't support locking accounts. See 99designs/keyring#85 for context.Attack on ethereum that affects Ethermint chain validators/nodes using
keyring_backend=test, making their funds remotely accessible viaeth_sendTransactionhttps://blog.ethereum.org/2015/08/29/security-alert-insecurely-configured-geth-can-make-funds-remotely-accessible/
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
Reviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...