Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: EmptyAppOptions implement DynamicConfig #23440

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 17, 2025
Merged

feat: EmptyAppOptions implement DynamicConfig #23440

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt commented Jan 17, 2025

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added a new EmptyAppOptions struct to support dynamic configuration testing
    • Implemented stub methods for retrieving configuration options with default empty/nil responses

The changes introduce a utility for testing scenarios that require a dynamic configuration interface with minimal implementation.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt added the backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release label Jan 17, 2025
@julienrbrt julienrbrt requested a review from a team as a code owner January 17, 2025 13:33
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new EmptyAppOptions struct in the testutil/sims/app_helpers.go file. This struct implements the server.DynamicConfig interface by providing two methods: Get and GetString. The Get method returns nil for any input, while GetString returns an empty string. A type assertion is included to ensure the struct satisfies the server.DynamicConfig interface. These changes add a stub implementation for application options handling without modifying existing functionality.

Changes

File Change Summary
testutil/sims/app_helpers.go - Added EmptyAppOptions struct
- Implemented Get method returning nil
- Implemented GetString method returning empty string
- Added type assertion to server.DynamicConfig interface

Finishing Touches

  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@julienrbrt your pull request is missing a changelog!

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (1)

Line range hint 289-299: Improve documentation accuracy and clarity.

The implementation looks good, but the documentation needs improvement:

  1. The struct comment mentions "AppOptions" but it implements server.DynamicConfig
  2. The method comments should describe their zero-value return behavior

Apply this diff to improve the documentation:

-// EmptyAppOptions is a stub implementing AppOptions
+// EmptyAppOptions is a stub implementing server.DynamicConfig
 type EmptyAppOptions struct{}
 
-// Get implements AppOptions
+// Get implements server.DynamicConfig by always returning nil
 func (ao EmptyAppOptions) Get(o string) interface{} {
   return nil
 }
 
-// GetString implements AppOptions
+// GetString implements server.DynamicConfig by always returning an empty string
 func (ao EmptyAppOptions) GetString(o string) string {
   return ""
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 642e881 and 379c561.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (7)
  • GitHub Check: tests (00)
  • GitHub Check: test-simapp-v2
  • GitHub Check: test-integration
  • GitHub Check: test-system-v2
  • GitHub Check: build (amd64)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze
  • GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (1)
testutil/sims/app_helpers.go (1)

286-286: LGTM! Good use of compile-time interface compliance check.

The type assertion ensures that EmptyAppOptions implements the server.DynamicConfig interface at compile time.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt enabled auto-merge January 17, 2025 16:00
@julienrbrt julienrbrt added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 17, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 86ab3f8 Jan 17, 2025
71 of 72 checks passed
@julienrbrt julienrbrt deleted the julien/nit branch January 17, 2025 17:11
mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
aljo242 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
…23446)

Co-authored-by: Julien Robert <julien@rbrt.fr>
Co-authored-by: aljo242 <alex@interchainlabs.io>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport/v0.52.x PR scheduled for inclusion in the v0.52's next stable release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants