-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
adding DeepCSV and DeepCMVA, removing JetProbability #261
adding DeepCSV and DeepCMVA, removing JetProbability #261
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, I didn't know these were available in the late 80 releases :-). The tests fail exactly as expected indeed, with missing/new branches
FYI, CMVA is not really supported, and I think DeepCMVA isn't either. Also, the tagger tags are |
Thanks @swertz . It turns out that we also misread "is available in the release" as "is saved in the miniAOD", so we need to add a bit of configuration to update the jets with these b-tags. I got something working yesterday evening, I will further test and clean it up on Monday. |
- part of redoJEC, as rerunning b-tagging requires redoing the JEC - replace ":" to "_" in the branch names, in (Fat)JetsProducer
I pushed @pieterdavid changes which look fine to me 😄 Maybe @swertz should sign off on this one ? |
Few more comments on my commits that @OlivierBondu just merged in his branch: there are a number of warnings printed, from the configuration
which seem harmless, see this hypernews thread. The other ones are these:
which look a bit worrisome to me, but no changes in the momenta etc., so I hope this is a red herring as well (it's a bit hard to understand what it really means - but I did not dig deeply into the code that produces it yet). |
One last point: @alesaggio @OlivierBondu don't forget to update the ZA config (passing the list of DeepCSV outputs to redoJEC, like here) as well, otherwise all values will be -1000 ;-) |
Looks fine to me! About the strange logs: both messages are mentioned in the HN thread and are reported to be "normal"... |
tracked at #257
NB: