refactor: timeline review #1222
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to several components and styles related to the timeline feature. Key updates include the removal of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
|
||
| max-height: 2em; | ||
| display: -webkit-box; | ||
| -webkit-line-clamp: 2; | ||
| line-clamp: 2; | ||
| -webkit-box-orient: vertical; | ||
| overflow: hidden; | ||
| text-overflow: ellipsis; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approve changes with minor suggestions for improved cross-browser compatibility
The changes effectively control the growth of the text content, aligning well with the PR objective. The implementation limits the text to two lines and adds an ellipsis for overflow, which should improve the timeline's layout consistency.
To enhance cross-browser compatibility, consider the following suggestions:
- Add the standard
display: box;alongside-webkit-boxfor better compatibility:
.section-content {
max-height: 2em;
+ display: box;
display: -webkit-box;
-webkit-line-clamp: 2;
line-clamp: 2;
-webkit-box-orient: vertical;
overflow: hidden;
text-overflow: ellipsis;
}- Consider adding a fallback method for browsers that don't support
line-clamp. One approach is to use themax-heightandoverflowproperties you've already set, combined withword-wrap: break-word;to ensure long words don't overflow:
.section-content {
max-height: 2em;
display: box;
display: -webkit-box;
-webkit-line-clamp: 2;
line-clamp: 2;
-webkit-box-orient: vertical;
overflow: hidden;
text-overflow: ellipsis;
+ word-wrap: break-word;
}These changes will help ensure a more consistent appearance across different browsers while maintaining the desired functionality.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| max-height: 2em; | |
| display: -webkit-box; | |
| -webkit-line-clamp: 2; | |
| line-clamp: 2; | |
| -webkit-box-orient: vertical; | |
| overflow: hidden; | |
| text-overflow: ellipsis; | |
| max-height: 2em; | |
| display: box; | |
| display: -webkit-box; | |
| -webkit-line-clamp: 2; | |
| line-clamp: 2; | |
| -webkit-box-orient: vertical; | |
| overflow: hidden; | |
| text-overflow: ellipsis; | |
| word-wrap: break-word; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/Timeline.module.scss (3)
10-11: LGTM with a minor suggestion.The addition of
box-sizing: content-boxandbox-shadowenhances the visual presentation of the timeline. However, consider using a CSS variable for the box-shadow color to improve maintainability.Consider refactoring the box-shadow color:
- box-shadow: inset 0 1rem 0 0 $gray-1100; + box-shadow: inset 0 1rem 0 0 var(--timeline-shadow-color, $gray-1100);
24-40: LGTM with a suggestion for consistency.The new
.timelineBlockclass effectively implements status-based styling. However, for consistency and maintainability, consider using a color variable for the 'live' status.Replace the hardcoded color value with a variable:
&[data-status='live'] { &::before { - background-color: red; + background-color: $active-red; } }
Line range hint
75-83: LGTM with a note on the TODO.The status-based styling for 'done' and 'live' statuses is a good addition. Regarding the TODO, the :has selector could indeed be used to simplify the CSS, but browser support should be considered.
Would you like me to provide an example of how to use the :has selector for this case, or create an issue to track this potential optimization?
apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/TimelineEntry.tsx (1)
81-81: LGTM: Improved comment clarity.The rewording of the comment is an improvement. It's more concise while maintaining the original meaning.
Minor suggestion: Consider adding a brief explanation of why isolating re-renders is beneficial in this context. This could provide valuable insight for future maintainers.
Here's a suggested enhancement:
-// extract component to isolate re-renders provoked by the clock changes +// Extract component to isolate re-renders provoked by clock changes, improving performanceapps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/Timeline.tsx (1)
64-88: Well-structured timeline entry rendering with room for minor improvement.The code effectively calculates and renders timeline entries with appropriate positioning and props. The comment about using
datasetfor midnight-crossing issues is helpful.Consider renaming the
startprop tostartTimeorstartTimestampfor improved clarity:- start={normalisedStart} // dataset solves issues related to crossing midnight + startTime={normalisedStart} // dataset solves issues related to crossing midnightThis change would make the prop's purpose more immediately clear to other developers.
apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/timeline.utils.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-205: Consider broader implications of the makeTimelineSections change.While the change to
makeTimelineSectionsis an improvement, consider the following points:
- Update any code that expects formatted time strings from this function.
- Verify type safety in TypeScript files using this function.
- Update documentation to reflect the new return type (numbers instead of formatted time strings).
To ensure a smooth transition:
- Search for all usages of
makeTimelineSectionsin the codebase and update as necessary.- Run TypeScript compiler to catch any type-related issues.
- Update relevant documentation, including any API docs or comments related to this function.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/Timeline.module.scss (3 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/Timeline.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/TimelineEntry.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/tests/timeline.utils.test.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/timeline-markers/TimelineMarkers.module.scss (1 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/timeline-markers/TimelineMarkers.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/timeline-progress-bar/TimelineProgressBar.module.scss (0 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/timeline-progress-bar/TimelineProgressBar.tsx (0 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/timeline.utils.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/timeline-progress-bar/TimelineProgressBar.module.scss
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/timeline-progress-bar/TimelineProgressBar.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (16)
apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/timeline-markers/TimelineMarkers.module.scss (3)
13-15: LGTM! Verify visual separation for various numbers of markers.The new styling for
spanelements improves the visual separation between markers:
- Only
spanelements that are not the first child have a left border.- This creates a clear delineation between markers while avoiding a border on the leftmost marker.
These changes should enhance the clarity of the timeline visualization.
To ensure these changes work as intended, consider the following verification steps:
- Test the timeline with various numbers of markers (e.g., 2, 3, 5, 10) to ensure proper visual separation.
- Verify that the leftmost marker doesn't have a left border in all cases.
- Check the appearance on different color schemes or themes, if applicable.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for timeline-related test files and theme configurations # Test: Look for timeline-related test files rg --type typescript "(describe|it).*(timeline|marker)" apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline # Test: Check for theme or color scheme configurations rg --type typescript --type scss "(theme|color scheme|dark mode|light mode)" apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline
2-3: LGTM! Consider verifying responsive behavior.The changes to the
.markersclass improve its flexibility:
- Absolute positioning with
left: 0;ensures consistent left alignment.- Changing
heightto100%allows the markers to span the full height of their container.These modifications enhance the adaptability of the timeline markers to different container sizes.
To ensure these changes work as intended across different viewport sizes, consider running the following verification steps:
- Test the timeline component at various screen sizes (mobile, tablet, desktop).
- Verify that the markers align correctly and span the full height of the timeline container in all cases.
- Check for any potential overflow issues, especially on smaller screens.
Also applies to: 5-5
6-6: Clarify the impact of removed text-related properties.The
line-height,margin-bottom, andfont-sizeproperties have been removed from the.markersclass. While this simplifies the styling, it may affect the text appearance within the markers.Please clarify:
- Was the removal of these properties intentional?
- How does this change impact the visual appearance of the marker text?
- Are these text-related styles now being applied from a parent element or a global style?
To verify the visual appearance, consider the following steps:
- Compare the rendered timeline markers before and after these changes.
- Ensure that the marker text is still legible and properly aligned.
- Check if the removal of
margin-bottomaffects the spacing between markers.apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/timeline-markers/TimelineMarkers.tsx (1)
18-20: Simplified rendering logic, but consider potential implications.The changes have made the code more concise and potentially more efficient. However, there are a few points to consider:
Removing the content from the
<span>elements might affect the visual representation or accessibility of the timeline markers. Ensure that this change aligns with the intended design and doesn't compromise user experience.Using
tagalone as the key is fine if it's guaranteed to be unique for each element. If there's any possibility of duplicate tags, consider reverting to the previous key format (${index}-${tag}) to avoid potential React reconciliation issues.To ensure the uniqueness of tags and verify the impact on accessibility, please run the following script:
apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/Timeline.module.scss (2)
22-22: LGTM: Minor syntax correction.The removal of the trailing comma is a good cleanup.
Line range hint
97-111: LGTM: Consistent status-based styling.The addition of status-based styling for 'done', 'live', and 'future' states in the .timeOverview class is consistent with the overall design and improves the visual feedback for different timeline entry states.
apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/__tests__/timeline.utils.test.ts (3)
56-58: Function name corrected:makeTmelineSections→makeTimelineSectionsThe function name has been correctly updated from
makeTmelineSectionstomakeTimelineSections, fixing a typo. This change improves code consistency and readability.
56-61: Consider adding test for midnight wrapping scenarioThe test for wrapping around midnight has been removed. If this functionality is still required, consider adding a test case to ensure it works correctly. If the requirement has changed, update the documentation to reflect this.
To confirm if midnight wrapping is still a requirement, please check the project documentation or consult with the product owner. If it's no longer needed, ensure that this change is documented in the PR description or related issue.
59-59: Verify the change in expected output formatThe expected output has been changed from an array of time strings (e.g.,
['11:00', '12:00', ...]) to an array of integers (e.g.,[11, 12, ...]). This change suggests a modification in themakeTimelineSectionsfunction implementation.Please ensure that:
- The
makeTimelineSectionsfunction in the main code has been updated to return an array of integers instead of time strings.- All other parts of the codebase that use
makeTimelineSectionshave been updated to handle the new output format.Run the following script to verify the function implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Verified:
makeTimelineSectionsreturns an array of integers and all usages are compatible
- The
makeTimelineSectionsfunction now returns[11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]as expected.- All parts of the codebase using
makeTimelineSections, includingTimelineMarkers.tsxand the corresponding test, handle the integer array correctly.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of makeTimelineSections function # Test: Search for the function definition and its usage rg --type typescript -A 10 'function makeTimelineSections' rg --type typescript -A 5 'makeTimelineSections\('Length of output: 183
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retry searching for makeTimelineSections function without using --type flag # Search for the function definition in .ts and .tsx files rg 'function makeTimelineSections' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' # Search for the function usage in .ts and .tsx files rg 'makeTimelineSections\(' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 660
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the implementation of makeTimelineSections function # Extract lines of the makeTimelineSections function rg 'export function makeTimelineSections' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' -A 20Length of output: 1863
apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/TimelineEntry.tsx (3)
44-44: LGTM: Addition ofdata-statusattribute enhances component flexibility.The new
data-statusattribute on the maindivelement is a good addition. It allows for more granular styling and selection based on the entry's status, which aligns well with the PR's objective of refactoring the timeline component.
Line range hint
1-96: Summary: Good refactoring with room for minor improvementsOverall, the changes to the
TimelineEntrycomponent align well with the PR objectives. The addition of thedata-statusattribute enhances flexibility, and the component extraction continues to support performance optimization.To further improve this PR:
- Clarify the purpose of the new
timelineBlockelement.- Consider enhancing the comment for the
TimelineEntryStatuscomponent to provide more context.These changes contribute positively to the timeline's functionality and maintainability.
52-52: Please clarify the purpose of the newtimelineBlockelement.A new
divelement with the classstyle.timelineBlockhas been added. While this might be intended for styling purposes, its exact role in the timeline's visual structure is not clear from the code alone. Could you please provide some context on the purpose of this element and how it contributes to the timeline's layout or functionality?To help understand the usage of this new class, let's check its definition in the SCSS file:
✅ Verification successful
Verified the purpose of the
timelineBlockelement.The
.timelineBlockclass is defined inapps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/Timeline.module.scssand applies specific styles such as height, background color, and width. This confirms that the empty<div>with thetimelineBlockclass is intended for visual styling within the timeline's layout.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of .timelineBlock in the SCSS files rg --type scss '.timelineBlock'Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of .timelineBlock in SCSS files using glob pattern rg '\.timelineBlock' --glob '*.scss'Length of output: 118
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the styles for .timelineBlock in Timeline.module.scss cat apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/Timeline.module.scssLength of output: 1995
apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/Timeline.tsx (3)
41-45: LGTM: Clear and concise event filtering logic.The code effectively filters out non-playable events and delays, which aligns with the component's purpose of rendering a timeline of playable events.
47-61: Well-implemented event status tracking and multi-day handling.This code segment effectively manages the progress status of events and handles scenarios where events cross midnight. The use of
elapsedDaysto normalize event start times across multiple days is a robust approach.
Line range hint
1-88: Verify the removal of TimelineProgressBar component.The AI summary mentioned the removal of the
TimelineProgressBarcomponent, but this change is not visible in the provided code diff.Please run the following script to confirm the removal and check for any remaining references:
If the
TimelineProgressBarhas been completely removed, ensure that its functionality is not needed or has been implemented differently. If it's still required, consider discussing its reimplementation or alternative solutions with the team.apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/timeline.utils.ts (1)
74-74: Approve the simplification, but verify impact on dependent code.The change to
makeTimelineSectionssimplifies the implementation and potentially improves performance by storing hour indices directly instead of formatted time strings. This is a good optimization.However, ensure that any code depending on the output of this function is updated to handle numbers instead of formatted time strings.
To verify the impact of this change, please run the following script:
This script will help identify any code that might need to be updated due to the change in the
makeTimelineSectionsfunction's output.
cpvalente
force-pushed
the
timeline-revision
branch
from
ee7c9a3
to
a9b28ac
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (14)
apps/client/src/views/ViewLoader.tsx (2)
1-7: LGTM! Consider destructuring PropsWithChildren import.The imports are well-organized and appropriate for the component's functionality. The use of custom hooks and CSS modules demonstrates good separation of concerns.
Consider destructuring the
PropsWithChildrenimport for consistency with React best practices:-import { PropsWithChildren } from 'react'; +import type { PropsWithChildren } from 'react';
13-28: LGTM! Consider extracting the loader to a separate component.The loader implementation and conditional rendering logic are well-structured. The comment about future React Suspense usage is helpful for context.
Consider extracting the loader into a separate component for better reusability:
const Loader = () => ( <div className={style.loader}> <div className={style.ellipsis}> <div /> <div /> <div /> <div /> </div> </div> ); // Then in the ViewLoader component: if (!shouldRender) { return <Loader />; }This would improve the readability of the
ViewLoadercomponent and make the loader reusable across the application if needed.apps/client/src/views/ViewLoader.module.scss (3)
6-11: LGTM: Effective full-screen loader implementation.The use of CSS Grid for centering and CSS variables for theming is commendable. Consider adding a z-index to ensure the loader appears above other content.
You might want to add a z-index to ensure the loader appears above other content:
.loader { display: grid; place-items: center; background-color: var(--background-color-override, $viewer-background-color); height: 100vh; + z-index: 9999; // Adjust the value as needed }
13-46: LGTM: Well-implemented loading animation.The ellipsis animation is efficiently styled and provides a smooth loading effect. The use of CSS variables for colors is great for theming.
Consider adding an aria-label to the loader for better accessibility:
.ellipsis { display: inline-block; position: relative; width: 5rem; + &::before { + content: "Loading"; + position: absolute; + width: 1px; + height: 1px; + padding: 0; + margin: -1px; + overflow: hidden; + clip: rect(0, 0, 0, 0); + white-space: nowrap; + border: 0; + } }This addition will provide screen readers with context about the loading state without visually affecting the layout.
48-73: LGTM: Well-crafted keyframe animations.The keyframe animations are well-defined and create a smooth, staggered effect. The use of transform for animations is good for performance.
Consider using CSS custom properties for animation durations to make it easier to adjust timing across all animations:
+:root { + --animation-duration: 0.6s; +} .ellipsis { div { &:nth-child(1) { - animation: lds-ellipsis1 0.6s infinite; + animation: lds-ellipsis1 var(--animation-duration) infinite; } // Apply similar changes to other animation declarations } }This change would allow you to easily adjust the animation speed for all dots by modifying a single variable.
apps/client/src/views/timeline/Timeline.module.scss (3)
4-4: Good addition of centralized variableThe introduction of
$view-backgroundis a positive change that enhances maintainability. It allows for easier global updates to the background color if needed in the future.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this variable, e.g.:
// Centralized background color for the timeline view $view-background: $ui-black;
26-38: Excellent addition of structured timeline block stylingThe new
.timelineBlockclass is a great addition, providing clear and structured styling for timeline elements. The use ofdata-statusfor conditional styling is a good practice that separates styling from logic.Consider using CSS custom properties for the status colors to improve maintainability:
.timelineBlock { --status-done-color: #{$active-red}; --status-live-color: #{$active-red}; &[data-status='done'] { background: var(--status-done-color); } &[data-status='live'] { background: linear-gradient(to right, var(--status-live-color) var(--progress, 0%), $white-60 var(--progress, 0%)); } }This approach would allow for easier updates to status colors in the future.
Line range hint
1-114: Overall excellent refactoring of timeline stylesThe changes in this file significantly improve the structure and maintainability of the timeline styles. Key improvements include:
- Introduction of the
$view-backgroundvariable for consistent color management.- Addition of the
.timelineBlockclass for better organization of timeline elements.- Consistent use of
data-statusattributes for conditional styling.- Improved border styling for content elements.
These changes align well with the PR objective of refactoring to control container growth. The new structure should make future modifications and maintenance easier.
To further improve the architecture, consider:
- Creating a separate file for timeline-specific variables and importing it here.
- Using CSS custom properties for values that might need to be dynamically changed, such as status colors or progress percentages.
These suggestions could enhance the modularity and flexibility of the timeline component.
apps/client/src/views/timeline/TimelinePage.scss (1)
88-95: Approve changes with a minor suggestion for consistency.The new styles effectively limit the section content to two lines and add an ellipsis for overflow, which aligns with the PR objective of controlling container growth. These changes improve the visual presentation and prevent uncontrolled expansion of the timeline entries.
For consistency, consider adding a
white-space: normal;property to ensure the text wraps as expected across all browsers.Here's a suggested modification:
.section-content { min-height: 2em; line-height: 1em; font-size: 3rem; text-transform: uppercase; font-weight: 600; max-height: 2em; display: -webkit-box; -webkit-line-clamp: 2; line-clamp: 2; -webkit-box-orient: vertical; overflow: hidden; text-overflow: ellipsis; + white-space: normal; }apps/client/src/features/viewers/public/Public.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-114: Summary of changes and potential impact.The modifications to the
Publiccomponent primarily involve the removal ofviewSettings-related code, including:
- Removal of the
ViewSettingsimport- Removal of the
viewSettingsproperty from theBackstagePropsinterface- Removal of the
useRuntimeStylesheethook and related rendering logicThese changes appear to be part of a refactoring effort to simplify the component. While they streamline the code, it's crucial to ensure that:
- The removal of runtime stylesheet loading doesn't negatively impact the application of styles.
- The component's rendering behavior remains correct without the previous conditional logic.
- Any components that previously relied on the
viewSettingsprop have been appropriately updated.To maintain code quality and prevent potential issues:
- Consider adding comments explaining the rationale behind these changes.
- Update the component's documentation to reflect the new prop structure and behavior.
- Ensure that comprehensive tests are in place to verify the component's functionality after these changes.
apps/client/src/views/timeline/timeline.utils.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-200: Summary: Positive changes, verify impact on the broader codebase.The changes in this file are part of a larger refactoring effort to improve code organization and simplify functionality. The modifications to import paths and the
makeTimelineSectionsfunction are positive improvements. However, it's crucial to verify the impact of these changes on the broader codebase to ensure no unintended side effects are introduced.Next steps:
- Run the suggested verification scripts to check for consistency in import paths and usage of
makeTimelineSections.- Review and update any code that relies on the old behavior of
makeTimelineSections.- Consider updating documentation or comments to reflect the new behavior of
makeTimelineSections.apps/client/src/AppRouter.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-186: Summary: Consistent implementation of ViewLoader and project structure reorganization.The changes in this file demonstrate a systematic approach to improving the application's routing and view loading mechanism:
- Introduction of a new ViewLoader component.
- Consistent application of ViewLoader across all relevant routes.
- Reorganization of the project structure, as evidenced by the updated Timeline component import path.
These changes should lead to improved loading behavior and a more organized codebase. The consistency of the changes across routes is commendable and indicates a well-executed refactoring effort.
To ensure the refactoring is complete:
- Verify that the ViewLoader component is implemented correctly and provides the expected functionality.
- Check if there are any remaining references to the old Timeline component path in other parts of the codebase.
- Consider updating the project documentation to reflect the new structure and the use of ViewLoader.
apps/client/src/views/timeline/Timeline.tsx (1)
42-42: Fix typo in commentIn the comment on line 42, "dont" should be "don't".
apps/client/src/views/timeline/TimelineEntry.tsx (1)
81-81: Nitpick: Improve comment wordingConsider rephrasing the comment for clarity and capitalization:
Original:
// extract component to isolate re-renders provoked by the clock changesSuggested:
// Extract component to isolate re-renders caused by clock changes
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (25)
- apps/client/src/AppRouter.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/ViewWrapper.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/backstage/Backstage.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/clock/Clock.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/countdown/Countdown.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/minimal-timer/MinimalTimer.tsx (0 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/public/Public.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/studio/StudioClock.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/Timeline.tsx (0 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/timeline-markers/TimelineMarkers.module.scss (0 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/timeline-progress-bar/TimelineProgressBar.module.scss (0 hunks)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/timeline-progress-bar/TimelineProgressBar.tsx (0 hunks)
- apps/client/src/views/ViewLoader.module.scss (1 hunks)
- apps/client/src/views/ViewLoader.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/client/src/views/timeline/Timeline.module.scss (2 hunks)
- apps/client/src/views/timeline/Timeline.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/client/src/views/timeline/TimelineEntry.tsx (4 hunks)
- apps/client/src/views/timeline/TimelinePage.scss (2 hunks)
- apps/client/src/views/timeline/TimelinePage.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/client/src/views/timeline/tests/timeline.utils.test.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/client/src/views/timeline/timeline-markers/TimelineMarkers.module.scss (1 hunks)
- apps/client/src/views/timeline/timeline-markers/TimelineMarkers.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/client/src/views/timeline/timeline-section/TimelineSection.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/client/src/views/timeline/timeline.options.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/client/src/views/timeline/timeline.utils.ts (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (5)
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/minimal-timer/MinimalTimer.tsx
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/Timeline.tsx
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/timeline-markers/TimelineMarkers.module.scss
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/timeline-progress-bar/TimelineProgressBar.module.scss
- apps/client/src/features/viewers/timeline/timeline-progress-bar/TimelineProgressBar.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- apps/client/src/views/timeline/timeline-markers/TimelineMarkers.module.scss
- apps/client/src/views/timeline/timeline-section/TimelineSection.tsx
- apps/client/src/views/timeline/timeline.options.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (45)
apps/client/src/views/timeline/timeline-markers/TimelineMarkers.tsx (2)
10-10: Good addition of descriptive commentThe added comment clearly describes the purpose of the
TimelineMarkerscomponent. It follows JSDoc style, which is beneficial for documentation and IDE support.
18-20: Verify the impact of empty span elements
The change to use only
tagas the key prop is good, assumingtagis unique for each element. This can improve performance by avoiding the use of array indices in keys.However, the removal of content from the
<span>elements is noteworthy:
- Ensure that this change doesn't negatively impact the visual representation of the timeline markers.
- Verify that there are appropriate CSS styles applied to these spans to create the desired visual markers.
Could you please confirm that the empty
<span>elements still correctly represent the timeline markers visually? You might want to check the associated CSS (likely inTimelineMarkers.module.scss) to ensure the styling creates visible markers without relying on content.To help verify this, you can run the following command to check the CSS file:
✅ Verification successful
Confirm CSS Styling for Span Elements
- The empty
<span>elements are styled with CSS classes that defineflex-growandborder-leftproperties.- These styles ensure that the spans render as visual timeline markers without needing inner content.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the CSS for the TimelineMarkers component # Test: Search for styles related to the markers or spans rg --type scss -A 5 $'(markers|span)'Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the CSS for the TimelineMarkers component by searching .scss files # Test: Search for styles related to the markers or spans rg -A 5 '(markers|span)' --glob '*.scss'Length of output: 1136
apps/client/src/views/ViewLoader.tsx (2)
30-32: LGTM! Clear and well-commented return statement.The use of a fragment to return children is appropriate, and the ESLint disable comment provides a clear explanation for its usage.
9-11: LGTM! Review the conditional hook argument.The component declaration and hook usage are well-structured. However, please review the argument passed to
useRuntimeStylesheet.The conditional
data.overrideStyles && overrideStylesURLmight cause issues ifdata.overrideStylesis falsy but not undefined. Consider using a more explicit condition:If the hook is consistently used with this pattern, consider updating the hook to handle this logic internally.
✅ Verification successful
Verified conditional argument usage in
useRuntimeStylesheet.The usage of
useRuntimeStylesheetwith a conditional argument is consistent across the codebase in the following components:
apps/client/src/views/ViewLoader.tsxapps/client/src/features/viewers/lower-thirds/LowerThird.tsxapps/client/src/features/viewers/timer/Timer.tsxNo issues found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of useRuntimeStylesheet in other components # Test: Search for other usages of useRuntimeStylesheet rg --type typescript -A 5 $'useRuntimeStylesheet'Length of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of useRuntimeStylesheet in other components # Test: Search for other usages of useRuntimeStylesheet in TypeScript files rg --type ts -A 5 'useRuntimeStylesheet' rg --type tsx -A 5 'useRuntimeStylesheet'Length of output: 3586
apps/client/src/views/ViewLoader.module.scss (2)
1-4: LGTM: Well-structured import and variable declarations.The import of viewer definitions and the use of variables for dot size and spacing promote consistency and maintainability.
1-73: Great implementation of a loading animation component.This new ViewLoader.module.scss file is well-structured, uses modern CSS techniques, and creates an effective loading animation. It aligns well with the PR objective of refactoring and controlling container growth by providing a clean, modular implementation of a loading component.
Key strengths:
- Use of CSS Grid for centering
- CSS variables for theming
- Efficient use of keyframe animations
- Modular and maintainable code structure
The suggested improvements (z-index, accessibility, and animation duration variable) are minor and don't detract from the overall quality of the implementation.
apps/client/src/views/timeline/__tests__/timeline.utils.test.ts (3)
56-56: Function name corrected:makeTmelineSections→makeTimelineSectionsThe function name has been corrected from
makeTmelineSectionstomakeTimelineSections, fixing a typo. This change improves code clarity and consistency.
59-59: Change in expected output format from string to numberThe expected output format has changed from string representation (e.g., '11:00') to numerical representation (e.g., 11). This change suggests a modification in the
makeTimelineSectionsfunction implementation.To ensure consistency, please verify that this change is reflected in the implementation of
makeTimelineSections:
56-60: Removal of midnight wrapping test caseThe test case for wrapping around midnight has been removed. This could indicate a change in the expected behavior of the
makeTimelineSectionsfunction or a simplification of the test cases.To ensure this removal is intentional and doesn't leave any functionality untested, please verify the following:
Check if the midnight wrapping functionality is still supported in the
makeTimelineSectionsimplementation:If the functionality is still present, consider adding a test case to cover it:
it('handles wrapping around midnight', () => { const result = makeTimelineSections(22, 2); expect(result).toEqual([22, 23, 0, 1]); });If the functionality has been intentionally removed, please update the function's documentation to reflect this change.
✅ Verification successful
Midnight Wrapping Functionality Removed
The
makeTimelineSectionsfunction no longer handles wrapping around midnight. The removal of the midnight wrapping test case is intentional. To ensure clarity, please update the function's documentation to reflect this change.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if midnight wrapping is still handled in makeTimelineSections # Test: Search for midnight handling in makeTimelineSections rg --type typescript 'makeTimelineSections.*\{' -A 20 | rg '(?i)midnight|24|00:00|23:59'Length of output: 125
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if midnight wrapping is still handled in makeTimelineSections # Test: Search for midnight handling in makeTimelineSections with correct file types rg --type ts --type tsx 'makeTimelineSections.*\{' -A 20 | rg '(?i)midnight|24|00:00|23:59'Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if midnight wrapping is still handled in makeTimelineSections # Test: Search for midnight handling in makeTimelineSections with glob patterns rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' 'makeTimelineSections.*\{' -A 20 | rg '(?i)midnight|24|00:00|23:59'Length of output: 101
apps/client/src/views/timeline/Timeline.module.scss (4)
1-1: LGTM: Import path simplificationThe updated import path for
viewerDefsis more concise and easier to maintain. This change suggests a positive step towards better project structure.
21-21: LGTM: Consistent use of centralized variableThe update to use
$view-backgroundfor theborder-leftcolor in the.columnclass maintains consistency with the earlier changes. This improves the overall maintainability of the styles.
70-71: LGTM: Consistent border stylingThe updates to use
$view-backgroundfor bothborder-bottomand the newborder-topin the.contentclass are consistent with earlier changes. This creates a more complete and visually consistent border around the content.
10-13: Approved changes with a query on box-sizingThe use of
$view-backgroundand the addition of thebox-shadowfor the progress background are good improvements.Could you clarify the reason for setting
box-sizing: content-box? This might affect the layout calculations. If it's intentional, consider adding a comment explaining its purpose.To verify the impact of this change, you can run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified changes with no layout issues detected
The use of
box-sizing: content-boxinTimeline.module.scssaligns with other instances in the codebase and does not introduce any layout problems. No further actions are required.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any other occurrences of box-sizing in the project # and potential layout issues caused by this change. echo "Searching for other box-sizing declarations:" rg --type css "box-sizing:" echo "\nChecking for potential layout issues in React components:" rg --type typescript --type javascript "className.*timeline"Length of output: 1415
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any other occurrences of box-sizing in the project # and potential layout issues caused by the box-sizing change. echo "Searching for other box-sizing declarations:" rg --type css "box-sizing:" echo "\nChecking for potential layout issues in React components:" rg --type ts --type tsx --type js --type jsx "className.*timeline"Length of output: 1414
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any other occurrences of box-sizing in the project # and potential layout issues caused by the box-sizing change. echo "Searching for other box-sizing declarations:" rg --type css "box-sizing:" echo "\nChecking for potential layout issues in React components:" rg --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" --glob "*.js" --glob "*.jsx" "className.*timeline"Length of output: 1877
apps/client/src/views/timeline/TimelinePage.tsx (3)
32-32: LGTM! Verify impact on parent components.The removal of the
viewSettingsprop fromTimelinePagePropssimplifies the component's interface. This change aligns with the removal ofviewSettings-related logic in the component.Run the following script to verify that no parent components are still trying to pass
viewSettingstoTimelinePage:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that no parent components are passing viewSettings to TimelinePage. # Test: Search for TimelinePage usage with viewSettings prop. Expect: No results. rg --type typescript '<TimelinePage.*viewSettings.*?>' || echo "No usage of TimelinePage with viewSettings prop found."
32-32: LGTM! Ensure no functionality loss.The removal of
viewSettingsfrom the destructured props is consistent with its removal from the interface. This change streamlines the component.To ensure no functionality has been lost, please run the following script to check for any remaining references to
viewSettingswithin the component:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to viewSettings within TimelinePage. # Test: Search for viewSettings usage within TimelinePage. Expect: No results. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'function TimelinePage($_) { $$$ viewSettings $$$ }'Additionally, please thoroughly test the TimelinePage component to verify that all functionality remains intact after this change.
Line range hint
1-85: Overall assessment: Changes look good, but verify broader impact.The modifications to
TimelinePage.tsxappear to be part of a larger refactoring effort to streamline the component and improve the project structure. The removal of theviewSettingsprop and related logic simplifies the component interface and implementation.Key points:
- Import paths have been updated, likely due to project restructuring.
- The
viewSettingsprop has been removed from both the interface and component implementation.- No other significant changes to the component's logic are visible.
Recommendations:
- Ensure that the new import paths are used consistently across the project.
- Verify that no parent components are still trying to pass
viewSettingstoTimelinePage.- Thoroughly test the
TimelinePagecomponent to ensure no functionality has been lost due to the removal ofviewSettings.- If this change is part of a larger refactoring effort, consider adding a brief comment in the PR description explaining the motivation and scope of these changes.
To get a broader view of the impact of these changes, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to viewSettings in other components and verify TimelinePage usage. # Test: Search for viewSettings usage in other components. Expect: No results or clear explanation for remaining usage. rg --type typescript 'viewSettings' -g '!TimelinePage.tsx' # Test: Check TimelinePage usage in other components. Expect: Consistent usage without viewSettings prop. rg --type typescript '<TimelinePage' -A 5Please review the results of this script to ensure the changes are consistent across the project.
apps/client/src/features/viewers/clock/Clock.tsx (4)
22-22: LGTM! Props destructuring updated correctly.The destructuring of props has been correctly updated to reflect the changes in the
ClockPropsinterface. This change maintains consistency with the interface modifications.
Line range hint
1-158: Overall, the changes look good and align with the PR objectives.The modifications to the Clock component successfully simplify its structure by removing the
viewSettingsprop and associated logic. This refactoring aligns well with the PR's objective of controlling container growth.Key points:
- The
ClockPropsinterface has been simplified.- Unnecessary stylesheet rendering logic has been removed.
- The core functionality of the Clock component remains intact.
These changes should improve the maintainability of the component without introducing new issues. Great job on the refactoring!
22-22: Verify impact of removed stylesheet rendering logic.The removal of the
useRuntimeStylesheetlogic and associated conditional rendering simplifies the component. However, we should ensure this change doesn't negatively impact the component's functionality or styling.Let's verify if there are any remaining references to
useRuntimeStylesheetor related logic:Please confirm that the removal of this logic doesn't affect the component's rendering or styling. Consider adding a comment explaining why this logic was removed if it's not obvious from the context.
✅ Verification successful
Let's retry the search without using the
--typeflag and instead target.tsand.tsxfiles directly:
Removal of
useRuntimeStylesheetverified.The
useRuntimeStylesheethas been successfully removed fromClock.tsx. No remaining references in this file were found, confirming that the stylesheet rendering logic has been removed as intended.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to useRuntimeStylesheet # Test 1: Search for useRuntimeStylesheet in the current file echo "Searching for useRuntimeStylesheet in Clock.tsx:" rg "useRuntimeStylesheet" apps/client/src/features/viewers/clock/Clock.tsx # Test 2: Search for useRuntimeStylesheet in other files of the project echo "Searching for useRuntimeStylesheet in other files:" rg "useRuntimeStylesheet" --type typescriptLength of output: 371
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to useRuntimeStylesheet # Test 1: Search for useRuntimeStylesheet in Clock.tsx echo "Searching for useRuntimeStylesheet in Clock.tsx:" rg "useRuntimeStylesheet" apps/client/src/features/viewers/clock/Clock.tsx # Test 2: Search for useRuntimeStylesheet in TypeScript files using file extensions echo "Searching for useRuntimeStylesheet in TypeScript files (.ts and .tsx):" rg "useRuntimeStylesheet" --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx"Length of output: 1190
2-2: LGTM! Verify usage ofSettingstype.The changes to the imports and
ClockPropsinterface look good. The removal ofviewSettingssimplifies the component's props structure.Let's verify the usage of the newly imported
Settingstype:Also applies to: 15-19
✅ Verification successful
Settingstype usage is correct.The
Settingstype is properly imported from 'ontime-types' and used in thesettingsprop of theClockcomponent asSettings | undefined.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of Settings type in the Clock component # Test: Search for usage of Settings type rg --type typescript "Settings" apps/client/src/features/viewers/clock/Clock.tsxLength of output: 371
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the usage of Settings type in the Clock component with correct file types # Test: Search for usage of Settings type in Clock.tsx using valid TypeScript file types rg --type ts --type tsx "Settings" apps/client/src/features/viewers/clock/Clock.tsxLength of output: 111
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of Settings type in the Clock component without specifying file types # Test: Search for usage of Settings type directly in Clock.tsx rg "Settings" apps/client/src/features/viewers/clock/Clock.tsxLength of output: 137
apps/client/src/features/viewers/studio/StudioClock.tsx (1)
30-30: Approved: Removal ofviewSettingsfrom props destructuringThe removal of
viewSettingsfrom the props destructuring is consistent with its removal from theStudioClockPropsinterface. This change simplifies the component's props by eliminating an unused property, which aligns with the PR objective of refactoring.To ensure all references to
viewSettingshave been removed, please run the following script:If the script returns any results, please review and remove any remaining references to
viewSettingsoruseRuntimeStylesheetif they are no longer needed.✅ Verification successful
Action Required: Update Shell Scripts to Validate
viewSettingsRemovalThe previous scripts failed due to an unrecognized file type. Please run the updated scripts below to ensure all references to
viewSettingshave been removed:
Action Required: Verify Complete Removal of
viewSettingsanduseRuntimeStylesheetThe previous attempts to verify the removal of
viewSettingsanduseRuntimeStylesheetfailed due to unrecognized file types. Please run the updated scripts below, which search for these references by targeting.tsxfiles directly:
Verified: Complete Removal of
viewSettingsanduseRuntimeStylesheetThe executed scripts confirmed that there are no remaining references to
viewSettingsoruseRuntimeStylesheetinStudioClock.tsx. This ensures that the removal of these properties from the props destructuring and imports has been successfully completed, aligning with the PR objective of refactoring.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to viewSettings in the StudioClock component # Test: Search for any remaining usage of viewSettings rg --type typescript 'viewSettings' apps/client/src/features/viewers/studio/StudioClock.tsx # Test: Check if useRuntimeStylesheet is still imported but unused rg --type typescript 'import.*useRuntimeStylesheet' apps/client/src/features/viewers/studio/StudioClock.tsxLength of output: 271
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to viewSettings in the StudioClock component # Test: Search for any remaining usage of viewSettings rg --type typescriptreact 'viewSettings' apps/client/src/features/viewers/studio/StudioClock.tsx # Test: Check if useRuntimeStylesheet is still imported but unused rg --type typescriptreact 'import.*useRuntimeStylesheet' apps/client/src/features/viewers/studio/StudioClock.tsxLength of output: 291
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to viewSettings and useRuntimeStylesheet in the StudioClock component # Test: Search for any remaining usage of viewSettings rg 'viewSettings' apps/client/src/features/viewers/studio/StudioClock.tsx # Test: Check if useRuntimeStylesheet is still imported but unused rg 'import.*useRuntimeStylesheet' apps/client/src/features/viewers/studio/StudioClock.tsxLength of output: 165
apps/client/src/features/viewers/ViewWrapper.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-138: Overall component structure and functionalityApart from the issue mentioned earlier, the overall structure and functionality of the
withDataHOC appear well-organized and follow good practices. The component efficiently fetches and passes various data to the wrapped component, making use of appropriate hooks and stores.Consider adding some comments to explain the purpose of the
withDataHOC and its data fetching strategy, which would improve the code's maintainability and readability for future developers.apps/client/src/features/viewers/public/Public.tsx (3)
4-4: LGTM: Import changes are consistent with prop removal.The removal of the
ViewSettingsimport aligns with the changes made to theBackstagePropsinterface. This change helps maintain code cleanliness by removing unused imports.
Line range hint
37-114: Verify impact of removing viewSettings-related code.The removal of
viewSettings-related code, including theuseRuntimeStylesheethook and conditional rendering logic, simplifies the component. However, it's crucial to ensure that this change doesn't negatively impact the component's functionality, especially regarding stylesheet loading and rendering.Please confirm the following:
- The removal of
useRuntimeStylesheetdoesn't affect the application of necessary styles.- The component renders correctly without the previous conditional logic (
shouldRender).- No unintended side effects occur due to the immediate rendering of the component.
Consider adding comments explaining the rationale behind these changes to improve code maintainability.
Line range hint
23-35: LGTM: BackstageProps interface updated correctly.The removal of the
viewSettingsproperty from theBackstagePropsinterface is consistent with the import changes. This simplification of the component's props is likely part of a larger refactoring effort.To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact other components, please run the following script to check for any remaining usage of
viewSettingsin relation to thePubliccomponent:apps/client/src/views/timeline/timeline.utils.ts (2)
72-72: LGTM! Verify impact on consumers ofmakeTimelineSections.The simplification of the
makeTimelineSectionsfunction improves its focus and flexibility. It now returns raw hour indices instead of formatted time strings, which aligns with the single responsibility principle.To ensure this change doesn't break existing functionality, please run the following script to find all usages of
makeTimelineSectionsand verify they handle the new return type correctly:#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of makeTimelineSections and verify they handle the new return type # Test: Search for makeTimelineSections usage. Expect: List of files using the function. rg --type typescript "makeTimelineSections" apps/Please review each usage to ensure it correctly handles the new hour index return type instead of formatted time strings.
14-16: LGTM! Verify import consistency across the codebase.The updated import paths reflect a change in the project's directory structure. This change improves code organization and is likely part of a larger refactoring effort.
To ensure consistency, please run the following script to check for any remaining occurrences of the old import paths:
✅ Verification successful
Import consistency verified. No old import paths detected.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for old import paths in the codebase # Test: Search for old import paths. Expect: No results. rg --type typescript "from '../../../common'" apps/Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for old import paths in TypeScript files within the apps directory # Test: Search for old import paths. Expect: No results. rg --type ts --type tsx "from '\\.\\.\\/\\.\\.\\/\\.\\.\\/common'" apps/Length of output: 179
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for old import paths in TypeScript files within the apps directory # Test: Search for old import paths. Expect: No results. rg --type ts --type tsx 'from \.\.\/\.\.\/\.\.\/common' apps/Length of output: 168
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for old import paths in TypeScript files within the apps directory # Test: Search for old import paths. Expect: No results. rg -F "from '../../../common'" apps/ -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"Length of output: 65
apps/client/src/AppRouter.tsx (10)
87-94: LGTM: ViewLoader added to '/public' route.The addition of ViewLoader to the '/public' route is consistent with the pattern established in the '/timer' route, maintaining a standardized approach to view loading.
95-102: LGTM: ViewLoader added to '/minimal' route.The addition of ViewLoader to the '/minimal' route maintains consistency with the established pattern for view loading.
103-110: LGTM: ViewLoader added to '/clock' route.The addition of ViewLoader to the '/clock' route continues the consistent application of the view loading pattern.
111-118: LGTM: ViewLoader added to '/countdown' route.The addition of ViewLoader to the '/countdown' route maintains the consistent application of the view loading pattern across routes.
119-126: LGTM: ViewLoader added to '/backstage' route.The addition of ViewLoader to the '/backstage' route continues the consistent application of the view loading pattern across the application's routes.
127-134: LGTM: ViewLoader added to '/studio' route.The addition of ViewLoader to the '/studio' route maintains the consistent application of the view loading pattern established throughout the router.
137-144: LGTM: ViewLoader added to '/timeline' route and consistent with import change.The addition of ViewLoader to the '/timeline' route completes the consistent application of the view loading pattern across all relevant routes. This change also aligns with the earlier modification to the Timeline component import path.
79-86: LGTM: ViewLoader added to '/timer' route.The addition of ViewLoader to the '/timer' route is consistent with the new import and suggests a standardized approach to view loading.
To ensure this pattern is applied consistently across routes, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent use of ViewLoader across routes # Test: Check if ViewLoader is used consistently in route definitions rg --type typescript --multiline "element=\{\s*<ViewLoader>\s*<\w+\s*\/>\s*<\/ViewLoader>\s*\}" ./src/AppRouter.tsx
31-31: Verify the new location of TimelinePage component.The import path for the Timeline component has been updated, which suggests a project structure reorganization. This change aligns with the new ViewLoader import from the 'views' directory.
Please run the following script to ensure the TimelinePage component exists in the new location:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new location of TimelinePage component # Test: Check if TimelinePage exists in the new location fd --type file --full-path "./src/views/timeline/TimelinePage.tsx" # Test: Ensure no references to the old path remain rg --type typescript "from '\.\/features\/viewers\/timeline\/TimelinePage'" ./src
17-17: LGTM: New ViewLoader component imported.The addition of the ViewLoader component is a good practice for managing loading states across multiple views.
To ensure the ViewLoader is implemented correctly, please run the following script:
apps/client/src/features/viewers/countdown/Countdown.tsx (3)
3-4: LGTM: Import statement improvementsThe consolidation of imports from 'ontime-types' and the addition of an empty line for spacing enhance code readability and organization.
Line range hint
1-165: Summary of Countdown component changesThe changes to the Countdown component focus on simplifying its interface by removing the
viewSettingsprop. This aligns with the PR objective of refactoring and controlling container growth. The modifications appear to be part of a larger effort to streamline the component's functionality.Key points:
- Import statements have been consolidated for better readability.
- The
viewSettingsprop has been removed from theCountdownPropsinterface and component logic.- No other significant changes were made to the component's core functionality or rendering logic.
These changes seem to improve the component's maintainability. However, it's crucial to ensure that the removal of
viewSettingsdoesn't inadvertently break any functionality in other parts of the application that might have depended on it.
29-29: Verify the impact of removing viewSettingsThe removal of the
viewSettingsprop from the destructuring assignment aligns with the simplification mentioned in the summary. This change reduces complexity by removing unnecessary props.Please run the following script to ensure that
viewSettingsis not used elsewhere in the component or in other parts of the codebase that might depend on it:apps/client/src/features/viewers/backstage/Backstage.tsx (3)
5-5: LGTM: Simplified props structureThe removal of the
ViewSettingsimport and theviewSettingsprop fromBackstagePropsaligns with the PR objectives of refactoring. This change simplifies the component's dependencies and prop structure.Also applies to: 42-43
Line range hint
1-165: Overall impact: Simplified component structureThe changes successfully remove the
viewSettingsprop and related logic, simplifying theBackstagecomponent. This aligns with the PR objectives of refactoring and controlling container growth.To ensure the changes don't have unintended consequences:
- Verify that all functionality previously dependent on
viewSettingshas been appropriately handled or is no longer needed.- Conduct thorough testing of the
Backstagecomponent to confirm that its core functionality remains intact.- Check if any other components or files need to be updated due to the removal of
viewSettings.#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential impacts of removing viewSettings # Test 1: Search for components that might have passed viewSettings to Backstage echo "Searching for components that might have passed viewSettings to Backstage:" rg -A 5 '<Backstage' apps/client/src/ # Test 2: Check for any ViewSettings usages in the project that might be affected echo "Checking for ViewSettings usages in the project:" rg 'ViewSettings' apps/client/src/
42-43: Verify removal of viewSettings functionalityThe removal of
viewSettingsfrom props destructuring is consistent with the interface changes. However, please confirm that any functionality previously dependent onviewSettingshas been appropriately handled or is no longer needed.apps/client/src/views/timeline/TimelineEntry.tsx (2)
1-2: Imports are correctly addedThe imports of
useTimerandgetProgressare appropriately added to support the new functionality in theActiveBlockcomponent.
98-103:ActiveBlockcomponent correctly implements the progress barThe
ActiveBlockcomponent usesuseTimerandgetProgressto calculate and display the progress bar when the status is'live'. The implementation is correct and follows best practices.
| @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ | |||
| @use '../../../theme/viewerDefs' as *; | |||
| @use '../../theme/viewerDefs' as *; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Multiple files are still using the old import path ../../theme/viewerDefs.
Please update the import paths in the following files to ensure consistency and prevent potential issues:
apps/client/src/views/timeline/TimelinePage.scssapps/client/src/views/timeline/Timeline.module.scssapps/client/src/features/viewers/timer/Timer.scssapps/client/src/features/viewers/studio/StudioClock.scssapps/client/src/features/viewers/public/Public.scssapps/client/src/features/viewers/countdown/Countdown.scssapps/client/src/features/viewers/clock/Clock.scssapps/client/src/features/viewers/backstage/Backstage.scssapps/client/src/features/viewers/minimal-timer/MinimalTimer.scssapps/client/src/features/control/playback/timer-display/TimerDisplay.module.scssapps/client/src/common/components/schedule/Schedule.scssapps/client/src/common/components/progress-bar/ProgressBar.scssapps/client/src/common/components/multi-part-progress-bar/MultiPartProgressBar.scssapps/client/src/common/components/title-card/TitleCard.scss
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the impact of the import path change.
The import path for viewerDefs has been updated, which suggests a change in the project structure. Ensure that this change is consistent across the project and doesn't break any other imports.
Run the following script to verify the import usage:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the updated import path.
# Test 1: Check if there are any remaining uses of the old import path
echo "Checking for any remaining uses of the old import path:"
rg --type scss "'../../../theme/viewerDefs'"
# Test 2: Verify the existence of the new import path
echo "Verifying the existence of the new import path:"
fd --type f "viewerDefs.scss" "apps/client/src/theme"
# Test 3: Check for any other files that might need similar updates
echo "Checking for other files that might need similar updates:"
rg --type scss "'../../../theme/viewerDefs'"
Length of output: 605
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the updated import path.
# Test 1: Check if there are any remaining uses of the old import path
echo "Checking for any remaining uses of the old import path:"
rg -g '*.scss' '../../theme/viewerDefs'
# Test 2: Verify the existence of the new import path
echo "Verifying the existence of the new import path:"
fd --type f "viewerDefs.scss" "apps/client/src/theme"
# Test 3: Check for any other files that might need similar updates
echo "Checking for other files that might need similar updates:"
rg -g '*.scss' '../../theme/viewerDefs'
Length of output: 3281
| import ViewParamsEditor from '../../common/components/view-params-editor/ViewParamsEditor'; | ||
| import { useWindowTitle } from '../../common/hooks/useWindowTitle'; | ||
| import { ViewExtendedTimer } from '../../common/models/TimeManager.type'; | ||
| import { formatTime, getDefaultFormat } from '../../common/utils/time'; | ||
| import SuperscriptTime from '../../features/viewers/common/superscript-time/SuperscriptTime'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
'viewSettings' prop still referenced in the project.
The viewSettings prop has been successfully removed from TimelinePage.tsx, but it is still referenced in other parts of the codebase. Please address the following files to complete the removal:
packages/types/src/definitions/DataModel.type.tsapps/server/src/models/demoProject.tsapps/server/src/api-data/view-settings/viewSettings.router.tsapps/server/src/models/dataModel.tsapps/server/src/api-data/db/db.controller.tsapps/server/src/api-data/db/db.validation.tsapps/server/src/api-data/index.tsapps/server/src/utils/parser.tsapps/server/src/utils/parserFunctions.tsapps/server/src/classes/data-provider/DataProvider.utils.tsapps/server/src/classes/data-provider/DataProvider.tsapps/server/src/classes/data-provider/__tests__/DataProvider.utils.test.tsapps/server/src/utils/__tests__/parser.test.tsapps/client/src/features/viewers/ViewWrapper.tsxapps/client/src/features/viewers/lower-thirds/LowerThird.tsxapps/client/src/features/operator/status-bar/StatusBar.tsxapps/client/src/features/operator/status-bar/StatusBarProgress.tsxapps/client/src/features/viewers/minimal-timer/MinimalTimer.tsxapps/client/src/features/app-settings/panel/general-panel/ViewSettingsForm.tsxapps/client/src/features/app-settings/panel/project-panel/ProjectMergeForm.tsxapps/client/src/features/viewers/timer/Timer.tsxapps/client/src/common/hooks-query/useViewSettings.tsapps/client/src/common/api/constants.tsapps/client/src/common/api/viewSettings.ts
Please ensure that all references to viewSettings are either removed or appropriately refactored to maintain project integrity.
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Verify new import paths across the project.
The changes to import statements appear to be part of a project restructuring. The new paths look correct, but it's important to ensure consistency across the entire project.
Run the following script to verify the new import paths:
Import path verification script encountered errors. Please run the corrected script below to verify the new import paths across the project.
Please run the following script to verify the removal of the viewSettings prop from TimelinePage.tsx and ensure no lingering references exist.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the new import paths are used consistently across the project.
# Test: Search for old import paths. Expect: No results.
rg --type typescript "from '../../common/components/view-params-editor/ViewParamsEditor'" || echo "Old ViewParamsEditor import not found."
rg --type typescript "from '../../common/hooks/useWindowTitle'" || echo "Old useWindowTitle import not found."
rg --type typescript "from '../../common/models/TimeManager.type'" || echo "Old ViewExtendedTimer import not found."
rg --type typescript "from '../../common/utils/time'" || echo "Old time utils import not found."
rg --type typescript "from '../../features/viewers/common/superscript-time/SuperscriptTime'" || echo "Old SuperscriptTime import not found."
# Test: Search for new import paths. Expect: Multiple results across the project.
rg --type typescript "from '../../common/components/view-params-editor/ViewParamsEditor'"
rg --type typescript "from '../../common/hooks/useWindowTitle'"
rg --type typescript "from '../../common/models/TimeManager.type'"
rg --type typescript "from '../../common/utils/time'"
rg --type typescript "from '../../features/viewers/common/superscript-time/SuperscriptTime'"
Length of output: 267
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the new import paths are used consistently across the project.
# Test: Search for old import paths. Expect: No results.
rg --type ts "from '../../common/components/view-params-editor/ViewParamsEditor'" || echo "Old ViewParamsEditor import not found."
rg --type ts "from '../../common/hooks/useWindowTitle'" || echo "Old useWindowTitle import not found."
rg --type ts "from '../../common/models/TimeManager.type'" || echo "Old ViewExtendedTimer import not found."
rg --type ts "from '../../common/utils/time'" || echo "Old time utils import not found."
rg --type ts "from '../../features/viewers/common/superscript-time/SuperscriptTime'" || echo "Old SuperscriptTime import not found."
# Test: Search for new import paths. Expect: Multiple results across the project.
rg --type ts "from '../../common/components/view-params-editor/ViewParamsEditor'"
rg --type ts "from '../../common/hooks/useWindowTitle'"
rg --type ts "from '../../common/models/TimeManager.type'"
rg --type ts "from '../../common/utils/time'"
rg --type ts "from '../../features/viewers/common/superscript-time/SuperscriptTime'"
Length of output: 3657
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the removal of the `viewSettings` prop and check for any remaining references.
# Test: Ensure `viewSettings` prop is removed from TimelinePageProps interface.
if rg --type ts "viewSettings" apps/client/src/views/timeline/TimelinePage.tsx; then
echo "Error: 'viewSettings' prop still found in TimelinePage.tsx."
else
echo "'viewSettings' prop successfully removed from TimelinePage.tsx."
fi
# Test: Search for any remaining references to `viewSettings` across the project.
if rg --type ts "viewSettings" --ignore-file .rgignore; then
echo "Error: 'viewSettings' prop still referenced in other parts of the project."
else
echo "No remaining references to 'viewSettings' found in the project."
fi
Length of output: 8654
| // // prevent render until we get all the data we need | ||
| // if (!viewSettings) { | ||
| // return null; | ||
| // } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Issues Found: Potential Runtime Errors Due to viewSettings Usage
The removal of the safeguard for viewSettings has led to multiple instances where viewSettings is accessed directly without checking for its existence. This can cause runtime errors if viewSettings is undefined during the component's render.
Affected Areas:
apps/client/src/features/viewers/timer/Timer.tsxapps/client/src/features/viewers/minimal-timer/MinimalTimer.tsxapps/client/src/features/viewers/lower-thirds/LowerThird.tsx
Recommendations:
- Reintroduce the Safeguard:
- Reinstate the conditional rendering to ensure the component only renders when
viewSettingsis available.
if (!viewSettings) { return null; }
- Reinstate the conditional rendering to ensure the component only renders when
- Consistent Handling:
- Ensure all accesses to
viewSettingsuse optional chaining or include checks to handle cases where it might beundefined.
const value = viewSettings?.property;
- Ensure all accesses to
- Fallbacks and Defaults:
- Provide default values or fallback UI elements to enhance user experience when
viewSettingsis not available.
- Provide default values or fallback UI elements to enhance user experience when
🔗 Analysis chain
Potential issue: Removed safeguard for viewSettings
The commented-out code was preventing the component from rendering until viewSettings was available. Removing this check could lead to the following issues:
- The component might render before
viewSettingsis available, potentially causing runtime errors. - It may affect the user experience by showing incomplete or incorrect data.
- Other parts of the component might rely on
viewSettingsbeing available.
Please clarify the reasoning behind this change and consider the following recommendations:
- Add a fallback or loading state if
viewSettingsis undefined. - Verify that all uses of
viewSettingsin the component handle the possibility of it being undefined.
To help verify the impact of this change, please run the following script:
This script will help identify potential issues with viewSettings usage in the viewers feature. Please review the results to ensure that all uses of viewSettings are safe when it might be undefined.
To address the issue with the previous script, please run the following updated scripts:
These scripts search specifically for .ts and .tsx files, ensuring that rg processes the correct file types without relying on the --type flag.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usages of viewSettings that might cause issues if undefined
# Test 1: Check for direct usage of viewSettings properties
echo "Checking for direct usage of viewSettings properties:"
rg --type typescript 'viewSettings\.' apps/client/src/features/viewers
# Test 2: Check for spread of viewSettings
echo "Checking for spread of viewSettings:"
rg --type typescript '\.\.\.\s*viewSettings' apps/client/src/features/viewers
# Test 3: Check for optional chaining on viewSettings
echo "Checking for optional chaining on viewSettings:"
rg --type typescript 'viewSettings\?\.' apps/client/src/features/viewers
Length of output: 637
Script:
#
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for usages of viewSettings that might cause issues if undefined
# Test 1: Check for direct usage of viewSettings properties in .ts and .tsx files
echo "Checking for direct usage of viewSettings properties:"
rg 'viewSettings\.' apps/client/src/features/viewers --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'
# Test 2: Check for spread of viewSettings in .ts and .tsx files
echo "Checking for spread of viewSettings:"
rg '\.\.\.\s*viewSettings' apps/client/src/features/viewers --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'
# Test 3: Check for optional chaining on viewSettings in .ts and .tsx files
echo "Checking for optional chaining on viewSettings:"
rg 'viewSettings\?\.' apps/client/src/features/viewers --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'
Length of output: 2711
| let eventStatus: ProgressStatus = selectedEventId ? 'done' : 'future'; | ||
| let elapsedDays = 0; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor eventStatus logic to compute event status per event
Currently, the eventStatus variable is mutated across iterations of the rundown.map function, which can lead to unexpected behavior and reduces code clarity. It's better to compute the status for each event individually to improve maintainability.
Apply this diff to refactor the code:
@@ -35,3 +35,3 @@
// we use selectedEventId as a signifier on whether the timeline is live
-let eventStatus: ProgressStatus = selectedEventId ? 'done' : 'future';
+let hasLiveEventOccurred = false;
@@ -47,7 +47,11 @@
-// keep track of progress of rundown
-if (eventStatus === 'live') {
- eventStatus = 'future';
-}
-if (event.id === selectedEventId) {
- eventStatus = 'live';
-}
+let status: ProgressStatus;
+if (event.id === selectedEventId) {
+ status = 'live';
+ hasLiveEventOccurred = true;
+} else if (hasLiveEventOccurred) {
+ status = 'future';
+} else {
+ status = 'done';
+}
@@ -82,2 +86,2 @@
left={elementLeftPosition}
- status={eventStatus}
+ status={status}Also applies to: 48-53, 82-82
| @@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ export function TimelineEntry(props: TimelineEntryProps) { | |||
| width: `${width}px`, | |||
| }} | |||
| > | |||
| {status === 'live' ? <ActiveBlock /> : <div data-status={status} className={style.timelineBlock} />} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Ensure consistent data-status attributes by passing status to ActiveBlock
In line 52, when status === 'live', the ActiveBlock component is rendered, which sets data-status='live' inside its returned div. In the else branch, a div is rendered with data-status={status}. To maintain consistency and flexibility, consider passing status as a prop to ActiveBlock and setting data-status={status} within it. This ensures that if the status logic changes in the future, ActiveBlock remains consistent with the rest of the code.
Apply the following changes:
At line 52, pass status to ActiveBlock:
- {status === 'live' ? <ActiveBlock /> : <div data-status={status} className={style.timelineBlock} />}
+ {status === 'live' ? <ActiveBlock status={status} /> : <div data-status={status} className={style.timelineBlock} />}Modify ActiveBlock to accept status as a prop and use it:
- function ActiveBlock() {
+ function ActiveBlock({ status }: { status: ProgressStatus }) {And in the return statement:
- return <div data-status='live' className={style.timelineBlock} style={{ '--progress': `${progress}%` }} />;
+ return <div data-status={status} className={style.timelineBlock} style={{ '--progress': `${progress}%` }} />;Also applies to: 99-103
cpvalente
changed the title
cpvalente
force-pushed
the
timeline-revision
branch
5 times, most recently
from
8f5c51d
to
a0913ab
Compare
cpvalente
force-pushed
the
timeline-revision
branch
from
a0913ab
to
e831fac
Compare
Making some tweaks to the timeline