Thermal tests + CI in DQM

[hashkar]

This pull request contains changes to make the DQM easily usable for the thermal tests.
The main changes also include the integration of CI tests for the DQM.
This is just an initiation to the CI tests. They are not complete yet. The first function of each class is tested here.

[hashkar]

One thing that needs to be fixed before accepting this pull request is the path to the data file used for the tests. @jlenain can you point me to the one you mentioned yesterday?

[jlenain]

One thing that needs to be fixed before accepting this pull request is the path to the data file used for the tests. @jlenain can you point me to the one you mentioned yesterday?

There are a few such instances throughout nectarchain, e.g.

nectarchain/src/nectarchain/makers/calibration/tests/test_pedestal_tool.py

Line 11 in e72010a

run_file = get_dataset_path('NectarCAM.Run3938.30events.fits.fz')

[jlenain]

@hashkar , one thing that I am wondering is whether the DQM module is the best place for thermal test analyses. In my understanding, the DQM should run a quality monitoring as generic as possible. A dedicated analysis of runs for thermal tests would be better placed into user_scripts, in my opinion. What do you think ? @frnbrun , @vmarandon as well ?

[hashkar]

@jlenain I totally agree. The DQM module is still the same I just changed small things in it to be able to compute the quantities needed for the thermal tests easily. These quantities are also useful for the DQM (for example pedestal averaged for the first 20 samples). In the user_script there will be the script to launch the thermal tests and analyze + plot the results.

[jlenain]

I guess the prints were meant to assess which value to assert the tests. Could you please remove these? Thanks!

[jlenain]

Some changes may be redundant with PR #148 , or adjusted accordingly. We'll take care of that when merging the two PRs.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 44.82759% with 32 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 48.63%. Comparing base (b306f30) to head (911ad40).
Report is 21 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/nectarchain/dqm/charge_integration.py	34.09%	29 Missing ⚠️
src/nectarchain/dqm/start_dqm.py	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #122      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   40.76%   48.63%   +7.86%     
==========================================
  Files          65       64       -1     
  Lines        4452     4581     +129     
==========================================
+ Hits         1815     2228     +413     
+ Misses       2637     2353     -284     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.