Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix typo in request-inputs.md #591

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2024
Merged

Conversation

j0urneyK
Copy link
Contributor

@j0urneyK j0urneyK commented Sep 30, 2024

This PR fixes a typo in the request-inputs.md docs.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the request input handling documentation for the Go-based API framework.
    • Introduced new tags for input parameters and clarified the usage of the required tag.
    • Expanded examples for various data types and refined request body handling.
    • Added multipart form data handling for file uploads and enhanced examples for request input structs.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The document has been updated to enhance the understanding of request input handling in a Go-based API framework. Changes include the addition of new tags for input parameters, expanded examples for various data types, refined handling of request bodies, and the introduction of multipart form data handling. The examples of request input structs have been improved, and the section on input composition has been clarified for better struct embedding.

Changes

Files Change Summary
docs/docs/features/request-inputs.md Updated to include new tags for input parameters, expanded examples for data types, refined request body handling, and introduced multipart form data handling.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant API
    participant RequestHandler

    Client->>API: Send request with parameters
    API->>RequestHandler: Process request
    RequestHandler->>RequestHandler: Validate input parameters
    RequestHandler->>RequestHandler: Handle request body
    RequestHandler->>RequestHandler: Process multipart form data (if any)
    RequestHandler->>API: Return response
    API->>Client: Send response
Loading

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
New tags and structures brighten the day.
With inputs refined, oh what a delight,
Multipart forms make uploads just right!
Hopping through structs, we leap and we bound,
In this API garden, joy can be found! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
docs/docs/features/request-inputs.md (1)

84-84: Replace hard tabs with spaces for consistency.

The static analysis tool detected the use of hard tabs on this line. To maintain consistency with the rest of the document and improve readability across different editors, it's recommended to replace the hard tab with spaces.

Here's the suggested change:

-	RawBody []byte `contentType:"text/plain"`
+    RawBody []byte `contentType:"text/plain"`
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint

84-84: Column: 1
Hard tabs

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8313d66 and da4eb4e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/docs/features/request-inputs.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Markdownlint
docs/docs/features/request-inputs.md

84-84: Column: 1
Hard tabs

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/docs/features/request-inputs.md (1)

84-84: Approve the addition of the RawBody example.

The added line provides a valuable example of how to use RawBody with a specific content type. This addition enhances the documentation by demonstrating the practical usage of RawBody for handling plain text input.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint

84-84: Column: 1
Hard tabs

(MD010, no-hard-tabs)

Copy link
Owner

@danielgtaylor danielgtaylor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.80%. Comparing base (8313d66) to head (da4eb4e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #591   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.80%   92.80%           
=======================================
  Files          22       22           
  Lines        3903     3903           
=======================================
  Hits         3622     3622           
  Misses        236      236           
  Partials       45       45           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@danielgtaylor danielgtaylor merged commit 6e119e8 into danielgtaylor:main Sep 30, 2024
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants