-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 301
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DAOS-13777 control: Invalid storage information with MD-on-SSD #12485
Merged
+162
−8
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9e25787
DAOS-13777 control: Invalid storage information with MD-on-SSD
kanard38 db4fd3e
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into ckochhof/fix/master…
kanard38 bc2f5aa
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into ckochhof/fix/master…
kanard38 e75b2ef
DAOS-13777 control: Invalid storage information with MD-on-SSD
kanard38 3b37d17
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into ckochhof/fix/master…
kanard38 fa65e00
DAOS-13777 control: Invalid storage information with MD-on-SSD
kanard38 9abbc1e
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into ckochhof/fix/master…
kanard38 f069033
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into ckochhof/fix/master…
kanard38 969597e
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into ckochhof/fix/master…
kanard38 070a496
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into ckochhof/fix/master…
kanard38 b9e66f8
Features: control
kanard38 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good change for ctl_storage_rpc_test.go, but I was hoping to see a test case for this one as well, showing that we now skip the non-data SSDs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
processNVMeSpaceStats()
functionThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the remark.
The unit test allowed me to fix a potential issue.
Indeed, the device was not skipped: forgot the continue statement.
However, as the usable size was reset to zero in the control plane it was not detected with the functional tests.
With future update of the control plane, this last action could have not been done any more and a bug would arise.