-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 301
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DAOS-16310 test: consolidate il and ioil tags #14881
Conversation
Update il -> ioil for consistency Skip-unit-tests: true Skip-fault-injection-test: true Required-githooks: true Signed-off-by: Dalton Bohning <dalton.bohning@intel.com>
Ticket title is 'ftest: consolidate il and ioil tags' |
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ def test_ior_intercept_messages_pil4dfs(self): | |||
|
|||
:avocado: tags=all,full_regression | |||
:avocado: tags=hw,medium | |||
:avocado: tags=daosio,dfuse,il,ior,ior_intercept,pil4dfs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@wiliamhuang I'm not sure why for some of these that had il
and pil4dfs
, but do they need ioil
? Or JUST pil4dfs
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It needs only "pil4dfs" here.
I probably thought "il" including "ioil" and "pil4dfs" previously.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could make il include both ioil and pil4dfs if that is useful, but it's not 100% the case today
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does "dfuse" include both "ioil" and "pil4dfs" already? If yes, then "il" may be not necessary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure... Let me check and update if needed. So in total would you be okay with these?
- dfuse - dfuse-related tests
- ioil - specifically dfuse + ioil tests
- pil4dfs - specifically dfuse + pil4dfs tests
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. Sounds good to me. Thank you very much!
Skip-unit-tests: true Skip-fault-injection-test: true Required-githooks: true Signed-off-by: Dalton Bohning <dalton.bohning@intel.com>
Test stage Functional on EL 8.8 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14881/2/execution/node/823/log |
Skip-unit-tests: true Skip-fault-injection-test: true Allow-unstable-test: true Required-githooks: true Signed-off-by: Dalton Bohning <dalton.bohning@intel.com>
Test stage Functional on EL 8.8 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14881/3/execution/node/798/log |
Test stage Functional Hardware Medium completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-14881/3/execution/node/1105/log |
Update il -> ioil for consistency Skip-unit-tests: true Skip-fault-injection-test: true Allow-unstable-test: true Required-githooks: true Signed-off-by: Dalton Bohning <dalton.bohning@intel.com>
Update il -> ioil for consistency
Skip-unit-tests: true
Skip-fault-injection-test: true
Required-githooks: true
Before requesting gatekeeper:
Features:
(orTest-tag*
) commit pragma was used or there is a reason documented that there are no appropriate tags for this PR.Gatekeeper: