Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DAOS-16635 control: Pass meta_sz to pool extend+reintegrate API #15459

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 13, 2024

Conversation

tanabarr
Copy link
Contributor

@tanabarr tanabarr commented Nov 6, 2024

Enable pool extend and reintegrate API to use MD-on-SSD mem-ratio to
calculate differential between VOS-file and META-blob sizes. Add
mem-ratio to RPCs generated by the control-plane and update handlers
to pass different scm_sz and meta_sz values into the API. Update MS-DB
to store pool-specific mem-ratio and inject into relevant requests and
remove unused tgt_dev parameter from engine pool APIs.

Required-githooks: true

Before requesting gatekeeper:

  • Two review approvals and any prior change requests have been resolved.
  • Testing is complete and all tests passed or there is a reason documented in the PR why it should be force landed and forced-landing tag is set.
  • Features: (or Test-tag*) commit pragma was used or there is a reason documented that there are no appropriate tags for this PR.
  • Commit messages follows the guidelines outlined here.
  • Any tests skipped by the ticket being addressed have been run and passed in the PR.

Gatekeeper:

  • You are the appropriate gatekeeper to be landing the patch.
  • The PR has 2 reviews by people familiar with the code, including appropriate owners.
  • Githooks were used. If not, request that user install them and check copyright dates.
  • Checkpatch issues are resolved. Pay particular attention to ones that will show up on future PRs.
  • All builds have passed. Check non-required builds for any new compiler warnings.
  • Sufficient testing is done. Check feature pragmas and test tags and that tests skipped for the ticket are run and now pass with the changes.
  • If applicable, the PR has addressed any potential version compatibility issues.
  • Check the target branch. If it is master branch, should the PR go to a feature branch? If it is a release branch, does it have merge approval in the JIRA ticket.
  • Extra checks if forced landing is requested
    • Review comments are sufficiently resolved, particularly by prior reviewers that requested changes.
    • No new NLT or valgrind warnings. Check the classic view.
    • Quick-build or Quick-functional is not used.
  • Fix the commit message upon landing. Check the standard here. Edit it to create a single commit. If necessary, ask submitter for a new summary.

Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Tom Nabarro <tom.nabarro@intel.com>
@tanabarr tanabarr added control-plane work on the management infrastructure of the DAOS Control Plane meta-on-ssd Metadata on SSD Feature labels Nov 6, 2024
@tanabarr tanabarr self-assigned this Nov 6, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 6, 2024

Ticket title is 'Pass meta_sz to pool extend|reintegrate API'
Status is 'In Review'
Labels: 'md_on_ssd2'
https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-16635

Features: control
Skip-func-hw-test-medium-md-on-ssd: false
Skip-func-hw-test-large-md-on-ssd: false
Allow-unstable-test: true
Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Tom Nabarro <tom.nabarro@intel.com>
@tanabarr tanabarr marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2024 23:11
@tanabarr tanabarr requested review from a team as code owners November 6, 2024 23:11
@tanabarr tanabarr requested review from NiuYawei, mjmac, kjacque and knard-intel and removed request for a team November 6, 2024 23:11
@daosbuild1
Copy link
Collaborator

Test stage Functional on EL 8.8 completed with status FAILURE. https://build.hpdd.intel.com//job/daos-stack/job/daos/view/change-requests/job/PR-15459/2/execution/node/1186/log

… ranks ds api

Features: control
Skip-func-hw-test-medium-md-on-ssd: false
Skip-func-hw-test-large-md-on-ssd: false
Allow-unstable-test: true
Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Tom Nabarro <tom.nabarro@intel.com>
Features: control
Skip-func-hw-test-medium-md-on-ssd: false
Skip-func-hw-test-large-md-on-ssd: false
Allow-unstable-test: true
Required-githooks: true

Signed-off-by: Tom Nabarro <tom.nabarro@intel.com>
@tanabarr tanabarr force-pushed the tanabarr/control-meta_sz-sysdb-mdonssd branch from 1f96225 to acf0e0c Compare November 7, 2024 16:45
@@ -34,6 +34,23 @@ import (
"github.com/daos-stack/daos/src/control/system/raft"
)

var (
mockTierBytes = []uint64{uint64(1), uint64(2)}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

minor - I don't think these need to be casted within the array

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will fix if I have to repush

src/mgmt/cli_mgmt.c Show resolved Hide resolved
@tanabarr tanabarr requested a review from kjacque November 9, 2024 13:10
@tanabarr tanabarr changed the title DAOS-16635 control,mgmt: Pass meta_sz to pool extend+reintegrate API DAOS-16635 control: Pass meta_sz to pool extend+reintegrate API Nov 11, 2024
@NiuYawei NiuYawei requested a review from liw November 12, 2024 01:16
Copy link
Contributor

@liw liw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AFAICS, the C changes look good to me.

@tanabarr tanabarr requested a review from a team November 13, 2024 12:28
@NiuYawei NiuYawei merged commit 0db1219 into master Nov 13, 2024
56 of 62 checks passed
@NiuYawei NiuYawei deleted the tanabarr/control-meta_sz-sysdb-mdonssd branch November 13, 2024 12:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
control-plane work on the management infrastructure of the DAOS Control Plane meta-on-ssd Metadata on SSD Feature
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants