Rename canvas enlargement -> enlarge canvas

[elstoc]

The current naming is completely inconsistent with how the rest of the modules are named in darktable

[elstoc]

To illustrate, if we wanted other modules to be named the same way then we'd have to have, for example "exposure adjustment", "image retouching", "tone equalizing".

In fact, to make it consistent with other modules, "enlarge" or "extend" might even be better

[victoryforce]

First of all, I am not a native speaker, so my point of view on language issues is still secondary. I don't have a native sense of the language, only an understanding of grammar. Well, I totally agree that the word "enlargement" looks rather... out of style, let's say.

To illustrate, if we wanted other modules to be named the same way then we'd have to have, for example "exposure adjustment", "image retouching", "tone equalizing".

My argument for "enlargement" instead of "enlarge" was precisely to be closer to the way the vast majority of other modules are named (that is, without describing the action with the use of a verb). If we wanted other modules to be named the same way as "enlarge canvas" then we'd have to have "equalize tone", "calibrate color", "correct lens", "remove haze"...

But, this is just my humble comment on the issues of consistency of names, I think it is better for native speakers to decide on this issue.

[TurboGit]

Thanks!

[elstoc]

If we wanted other modules to be named the same way as "enlarge canvas" then we'd have to have "equalize tone", "calibrate color", "correct lens", "remove haze"...

I do agree. "Enlarge" or "extend" would be more in keeping with other modules, but feel like that is maybe a bit too non-obvious (could be maybe misinterpreted). TBH there isn't all that much consistency anyway, but I think, for the moment, that "enlarge canvas" is just a bit less wrong.

(e.g. "filmic rgb" and "tone equalizer" aren't consistent with each other either)