Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(upload-files): stream big files (DEV-4469) #1335

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Dec 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jnussbaum
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@jnussbaum jnussbaum self-assigned this Dec 12, 2024
@jnussbaum jnussbaum changed the title feat(upload-files): stream big files refactor(upload-files): stream big files Dec 12, 2024
@jnussbaum jnussbaum requested a review from seakayone December 12, 2024 14:49
Copy link
Contributor

@seakayone seakayone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(nitpick) This is not a pure refactoring, you are changing the behaviour by changing the timeout value.

Generally I would appreciate a short description of the motiviation of the refactoring. My comment on merging the two try blocks might miss the context of your motivation and could be void.

Now after having reviewed this PR I think the central change in this PR is that the binaray_io is directly supported by requests. This looks good to me and my comment on the try block is void.

@jnussbaum jnussbaum changed the title refactor(upload-files): stream big files refactor(upload-files): stream big files (DEV-4469) Dec 16, 2024
Copy link

linear bot commented Dec 16, 2024

@jnussbaum jnussbaum enabled auto-merge (squash) December 23, 2024 20:09
@jnussbaum jnussbaum merged commit 201c515 into main Dec 23, 2024
14 checks passed
@jnussbaum jnussbaum deleted the wip/stream-uploads branch December 23, 2024 20:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants