Raise exception when reading non-UTC adjusted timestamps in parquet

[malhotrashivam]

Closes #3588
Related to #976

Also moved all parquet files which were stored in the core repo to Git LFS.
Interesting links about Git LFS

• https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/git-lfs
• https://earthly.dev/blog/a-developer-guide-to-git-lfs/

[devinrsmith]

Workflow updates look fine to me. I'm happy to take an lfs: true approach for all workflow files as you have done here - the advantage is it's consistent across all workflows. The other approach is to just use lfs: true for the tests - the advantage is that non-test workflows won't need to download the LFS files. I'm indifferent, at least until a point in time where we have a significant LFS download cost. I'll defer to other reviewers.

[rcaudy]

Workflow updates look fine to me. I'm happy to take an lfs: true approach for all workflow files as you have done here - the advantage is it's consistent across all workflows. The other approach is to just use lfs: true for the tests - the advantage is that non-test workflows won't need to download the LFS files. I'm indifferent, at least until a point in time where we have a significant LFS download cost. I'll defer to other reviewers.

Which approach do you think is best, @devinrsmith ? I wonder if we should start from a principal of "good hygiene" and only fetch lfs files for test workflows. Or do we expect to need some in, say, publishing or documentation workflows?

[devinrsmith]

I'm fine proceeding w/ a principal of "good hygiene"

[malhotrashivam]

I'm fine proceeding w/ a principal of "good hygiene"

Cool, I have reverted back the change to just Check CI and Nightly Check CI jobs.