Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Mellanox]Removing FEC from port_config.ini for SN5600 SKUs #109

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

dgsudharsan
Copy link
Owner

@dgsudharsan dgsudharsan commented Dec 19, 2024

Why I did it

Removed FEC mode from port_config.ini for SN5600 SKUs. FEC mode needs to come as part of user configuration as it depends on peer end capabilities as well.

Work item tracking
  • Microsoft ADO (number only):

How I did it

Modified port_config.ini

How to verify it

Loading the SKU and testing default configuration

Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

  • 201811
  • 201911
  • 202006
  • 202012
  • 202106
  • 202111
  • 202205
  • 202211
  • 202305

Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

Description for the changelog

Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes

A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

Ethernet496 496,497,498,499 etp63a 63 400000
Ethernet500 500,501,502,503 etp63b 63 400000
Ethernet504 504,505,506,507 etp64a 64 400000
Ethernet508 508,509,510,511 etp64b 64 400000
Ethernet512 512 etp65 65 25000
Copy link

@dprital dprital Dec 19, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please check. There was no such port on the file before the change

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ethernet512 is not part of the diff and exists even without my changes

@dgsudharsan dgsudharsan requested a review from dprital December 19, 2024 06:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants