Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add check in ClosureExpressionVisitor to use literal public method if available #135

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

rikbruil
Copy link

The PR belonging to #134.

I'm not sure if there was a reason not to check for existence of a method with the literal passed field name. If not, this PR adds this check ;)

@Majkl578
Copy link
Contributor

Internal note: We should consider using naming strategy provided from outside rather than trying to guess method name convention.

@albertboada
Copy link

albertboada commented Dec 21, 2017

Totally needing this 👍

@jwage
Copy link
Member

jwage commented Mar 23, 2018

Seems okay to me.

@Ocramius
Copy link
Member

Closing as won't fix and bc break for reasons matching the ones I've explained in #149

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants