Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable riscv64 R2R in installer #96941
Enable riscv64 R2R in installer #96941
Changes from all commits
959d350
5aa1708
5bd9942
f3d8697
ff30751
f2a372c
6d5c05a
3ef88b8
6d771e6
e23ab08
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Am I right that this things like this and the ones in eng/targetingpacks.targets will help with build issues like in #97791 (
There is no application host available for the specified RuntimeIdentifier 'linux-riscv64'
)?Also after update of sdk to 9.0.1-preview1 (#98476), similar issue started to happen during coreclr tests build:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Might be also related to #96978 even tough Crossgen2 should be disabled currently ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yup, it will help those.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure about removal of this right now, because currently crossgen2 is still not fully functional. Crossgen2 itself is compiled with crossgen2 with no issues, but then it crashes during launch.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't use this crossgen2 build in tests yet (#80154). So the tests will continue to use
dotnet crossgen2.dll
until (at least) preview 2 when arm NativeAOT changes are in.In the nuget package for end-user, we will have PublishReadyToRun variant with this PR, which makes sense since the whole riscv64 project is in-progress?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I think this is fine. We usually use crossgen2.dll directly, so we'll be able to continue doing so. And having crossgened crossgen2 in nuget is not much of a difference, since plain crossgen2 in nuget can also show issues on certain dlls.