Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[20658] Fix leak in SecurityManager::participant_volatile_message_secure_writer_ (backport #4673) #4724

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 9, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Apr 25, 2024

Description

This is a fix for #4553, which reported an increase in memory consumption when the partition of a secure DataWriter is changed. The consumption came from the history of the participant_volatile_message_secure_writer_ not being correctly cleared.

This PR:

@Mergifyio backport 2.13.x 2.10.x 2.6.x

Contributor Checklist

  • Commit messages follow the project guidelines.

  • The code follows the style guidelines of this project.

  • Tests that thoroughly check the new feature have been added/Regression tests checking the bug and its fix have been added; the added tests pass locally

  • Any new/modified methods have been properly documented using Doxygen.

  • N/A Any new configuration API has an equivalent XML API (with the corresponding XSD extension)

  • Changes are ABI compatible.

  • Changes are API compatible.

  • N/A New feature has been added to the versions.md file (if applicable).

  • N/A New feature has been documented/Current behavior is correctly described in the documentation.

  • Applicable backports have been included in the description.

Reviewer Checklist

  • The PR has a milestone assigned.
  • The title and description correctly express the PR's purpose.
  • Check contributor checklist is correct.
  • Check CI results: changes do not issue any warning.
  • Check CI results: failing tests are unrelated with the changes.

This is an automatic backport of pull request #4673 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

…er_ (#4673)

* Refs #20658. Add blackbox test.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>

* Refs #20658. Add expectations to unit test.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>

* Refs #20658. Fix issue.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>

* Refs #20658. Improve regression test.

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Miguel Company <miguelcompany@eprosima.com>
(cherry picked from commit 14ee8ef)
@MiguelCompany MiguelCompany added this to the v2.13.5 milestone Apr 25, 2024
@JesusPoderoso JesusPoderoso self-requested a review April 25, 2024 07:37
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ci-pending PR which CI is running label Apr 25, 2024
JesusPoderoso
JesusPoderoso previously approved these changes Apr 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@JesusPoderoso JesusPoderoso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with green CI

@JesusPoderoso
Copy link
Contributor

@richiprosima please test this

Signed-off-by: Mario Dominguez <mariodominguez@eprosima.com>
@JesusPoderoso
Copy link
Contributor

@richiprosima please test this

Copy link
Contributor

@JesusPoderoso JesusPoderoso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with green CI

@JesusPoderoso JesusPoderoso added ready-to-merge Ready to be merged. CI and changes have been reviewed and approved. and removed ci-pending PR which CI is running labels May 8, 2024
@EduPonz EduPonz merged commit 0dbccb3 into 2.13.x May 9, 2024
12 of 17 checks passed
@EduPonz EduPonz deleted the mergify/bp/2.13.x/pr-4673 branch May 9, 2024 12:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge Ready to be merged. CI and changes have been reviewed and approved.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants