Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[20742] Run is_plain method with the corresponding data representation (backport #4681) #4757

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 9, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented May 8, 2024

Description

The endpoints implementation (DataReaderImpl and DataWriterImpl) were calling is_plain method without the data representation, so it was not being considered.
This PR includes the data representation as an argument to is_plain so it is considered in both cases.

@Mergifyio backport 2.13.x

Contributor Checklist

  • Commit messages follow the project guidelines.

  • The code follows the style guidelines of this project.

  • Tests that thoroughly check the new feature have been added/Regression tests checking the bug and its fix have been added; the added tests pass locally

  • N/A Any new/modified methods have been properly documented using Doxygen.

  • N/A Any new configuration API has an equivalent XML API (with the corresponding XSD extension)

  • Changes are ABI compatible.

  • Changes are API compatible.

  • N/A New feature has been added to the versions.md file (if applicable).

  • N/A New feature has been documented/Current behavior is correctly described in the documentation.

  • Applicable backports have been included in the description.

Reviewer Checklist

  • The PR has a milestone assigned.
  • The title and description correctly express the PR's purpose.
  • Check contributor checklist is correct.
  • Check CI results: changes do not issue any warning.
  • Check CI results: failing tests are unrelated with the changes.

This is an automatic backport of pull request #4681 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

* Refs #20742: Add regression tests for endpoints

Signed-off-by: JesusPoderoso <jesuspoderoso@eprosima.com>

* Refs #20742: Run  method with the corresponding data representation

Signed-off-by: JesusPoderoso <jesuspoderoso@eprosima.com>

* Refs #20742: Set SampleLoanManager variable with property value

Signed-off-by: JesusPoderoso <jesuspoderoso@eprosima.com>

* Refs #20574: Please linter

Signed-off-by: JesusPoderoso <jesuspoderoso@eprosima.com>

* Refs #20742: Check `is_plain` for all possible DataReader's data representation

Signed-off-by: JesusPoderoso <jesuspoderoso@eprosima.com>

* Refs #20742: Fix failures in other tests

Signed-off-by: JesusPoderoso <jesuspoderoso@eprosima.com>

* Refs #20742: Fix unset datarepresentation case

Signed-off-by: JesusPoderoso <jesuspoderoso@eprosima.com>

* Refs #20742: Add Miguel' suggestion

Signed-off-by: JesusPoderoso <jesuspoderoso@eprosima.com>

* Refs #20742: Apply rev suggestions

Signed-off-by: JesusPoderoso <jesuspoderoso@eprosima.com>

* Refs #20742: Please linter

Signed-off-by: JesusPoderoso <jesuspoderoso@eprosima.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: JesusPoderoso <jesuspoderoso@eprosima.com>
(cherry picked from commit aef4f43)
@JesusPoderoso JesusPoderoso added this to the v2.13.5 milestone May 8, 2024
@JesusPoderoso JesusPoderoso self-requested a review May 8, 2024 09:15
@github-actions github-actions bot added ci-pending PR which CI is running labels May 8, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@JesusPoderoso JesusPoderoso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with green CI

@JesusPoderoso
Copy link
Contributor

@richiprosima please test this

@JesusPoderoso JesusPoderoso added ready-to-merge Ready to be merged. CI and changes have been reviewed and approved. and removed ci-pending PR which CI is running labels May 8, 2024
@EduPonz EduPonz merged commit 565890a into 2.13.x May 9, 2024
12 of 17 checks passed
@EduPonz EduPonz deleted the mergify/bp/2.13.x/pr-4681 branch May 9, 2024 12:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge Ready to be merged. CI and changes have been reviewed and approved.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants