Add IT for #5503 #5504
Merged
Add IT for #5503 #5504
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mnriem
approved these changes
Sep 17, 2024
BalusC
deleted the
issue_5503_add_integration_test_to_reassess_protected_views
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#5503
I looked around in TCK if protected views against different kinds of FacesServlet mappings was tested at all, but no. There's only one test
Bug22995287ITwhich only tests #4127 using a/faces/*mapping. Hence this IT to reassess protected views a bit more explicitly.Reminder: when a next Faces version is to be released, everyhing in
testcan simply be moved into a new TCK module (e.g.faces50). This is because the TCK in its current form doesn't allow adding new tests for an already released Faces version.