Skip to content

[Switch Expressions] Use control flow analysis rather than structural analysis of syntax tree, to flag switch rule blocks that complete normally. #522

[Switch Expressions] Use control flow analysis rather than structural analysis of syntax tree, to flag switch rule blocks that complete normally.

[Switch Expressions] Use control flow analysis rather than structural analysis of syntax tree, to flag switch rule blocks that complete normally. #522

Triggered via pull request December 14, 2024 03:14
Status Success
Total duration 1m 49s
Artifacts

pr-checks.yml

on: pull_request
check-freeze-period  /  verify-freeze-period
3s
check-freeze-period / verify-freeze-period
check-merge-commits  /  Block Merge Commits
8s
check-merge-commits / Block Merge Commits
check-versions  /  Check and increment service versions
1m 40s
check-versions / Check and increment service versions
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

4 warnings
check-freeze-period / verify-freeze-period
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
check-merge-commits / Block Merge Commits
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
check-versions / Check and increment service versions
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
check-versions / Check and increment service versions
No files were found with the provided path: version_increments.patch github_pull_request_number.txt. No artifacts will be uploaded.