-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 360
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
api: proposal proxy ports #2021
Conversation
Signed-off-by: zirain <zirain2009@gmail.com>
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2021 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 65.55% 65.67% +0.11%
==========================================
Files 92 92
Lines 13509 13509
==========================================
+ Hits 8856 8872 +16
+ Misses 4107 4094 -13
+ Partials 546 543 -3 |
@zirain can we add this post v0.6 ? |
sure, it's not urgent. |
// HealthCheck, Prometheus metrics. | ||
// If unspecified, defaults to 19001. | ||
// +optional | ||
ExtraPort *int32 `json:"extraPort,omitempty"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
extraPort
is not a great name imo
should we split this up into prometheusPort
& healthCheckPort
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nop, it will/should shared one port in most cases.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can we then come up with a better name
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do you have any good idea?
this's an alternative for #1787
xref: #1703
follow up of: #2015 (comment)