Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

api: proposal proxy ports #2021

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

zirain
Copy link
Contributor

@zirain zirain commented Oct 20, 2023

this's an alternative for #1787
xref: #1703
follow up of: #2015 (comment)

Signed-off-by: zirain <zirain2009@gmail.com>
@zirain zirain added this to the 0.6.0-rc1 milestone Oct 20, 2023
@zirain zirain requested a review from a team as a code owner October 20, 2023 02:19
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 20, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2021 (a6b1faf) into main (23c91a6) will increase coverage by 0.11%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2021      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   65.55%   65.67%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          92       92              
  Lines       13509    13509              
==========================================
+ Hits         8856     8872      +16     
+ Misses       4107     4094      -13     
+ Partials      546      543       -3     

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

@arkodg
Copy link
Contributor

arkodg commented Oct 20, 2023

@zirain can we add this post v0.6 ?

@zirain
Copy link
Contributor Author

zirain commented Oct 21, 2023

@zirain can we add this post v0.6 ?

sure, it's not urgent.

// HealthCheck, Prometheus metrics.
// If unspecified, defaults to 19001.
// +optional
ExtraPort *int32 `json:"extraPort,omitempty"`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

extraPort is not a great name imo
should we split this up into prometheusPort & healthCheckPort ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nop, it will/should shared one port in most cases.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we then come up with a better name

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do you have any good idea?

@zirain zirain closed this Nov 24, 2023
@zirain zirain deleted the proxy-ports branch November 24, 2023 12:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants