-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 360
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Reconcile BackendRefs on EnvoyProxy #3190
Closed
davidalger
wants to merge
10
commits into
envoyproxy:main
from
davidalger:algerdev/feat-ep-backendref-reconcile
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ef45d25
Reconcile backendRefs for access log sinks on envoyproxies
davidalger da8d2d3
Reconcile backendRefs for metrics sinks and tracing on envoyproxies
davidalger 629a51b
Revert some changes from initial backendRefs implementation that wont…
davidalger 460a23b
Implement tracing / accesslog backendRefs
davidalger 61b7323
Merge branch 'main' into algerdev/feat-ep-backendref-reconcile
davidalger 475fb5c
Update al cluster naming
davidalger 64da9da
Revert "Revert some changes from initial backendRefs implementation t…
davidalger 8491367
Fix e2e tests
davidalger d4c9040
Merge branch 'main' into algerdev/feat-ep-backendref-reconcile
davidalger e6040b2
Make linter happy
davidalger File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will panic if the backendRef refers to a Service which cannot be found. Ideally this would surface as a message on the status somewhere, similar to how it does on XRoutes.
Status isn't currently being used on EnvoyProxy as far as I can tell. It seems it could make sense to put errors such as this on the Gateway rather than the EnvoyProxy since it's something which will arise when processing the Gateway.
@arkodg @zirain Do either of you have thoughts on where errors such as this should be surfaced?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ah
GatewayClass
, lets tackle this separately, and raise a issue to track this because moving it toAccepted=False
will break everything in the next reconciliation :)500
similar togateway/internal/gatewayapi/route.go
Line 492 in 2c4d385