Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[6.0] Box.getReg implementation #1015
[6.0] Box.getReg implementation #1015
Changes from all commits
8208dd8
05c9e67
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The idea behind getReg was to have "computable" index, not just constant.
For example the index can come from Context variable and thus the concrete register will not be fixed in the ErgoTree. This will allow code like:
val x = box.getReg[Int](getVar[Int](varId).get).get
So I suggest to add additional test with variable register passed as function argument and have a series of cases in verifyCases.
"{ (x: (Box, Int)) => x._1.getReg[Long](x._2).get }"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
{ (x: (Box, Int)) => x._1.getReg[Long](x._2).get }
is way different frombox.getReg[Int](getVar[Int](varId).get).get
,so I've made a test in
BasicOpsSpecification
which is checking exactly context variable usage:and so the new test can also be used for reference for people asked for computable index.