dropping OPM down #1085
dropping OPM down #1085
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the JSON configuration files for web pages, specifically in Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pages/_meta.json (1)
81-90: Consider using a more descriptive key for the OP MAINNET sectionThe key
"chain"might be ambiguous or confusing. Consider using a more descriptive key that better reflects the section's content, such as"mainnet"or"op-mainnet", to maintain clarity and consistency with the section title.- "chain": { + "mainnet": { "title": "OP Mainnet", "display": "children" },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
pages/_meta.json(1 hunks)pages/stack/_meta.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- pages/stack/_meta.json
🔇 Additional comments (2)
pages/_meta.json (2)
68-77: LGTM: OP STACK section is well-structured
The configuration follows the established pattern with proper hierarchy and consistent casing.
68-90: Verify impact on documentation navigation
Since this reorganization might affect documentation URLs and navigation structure, please ensure:
- All internal documentation links are updated to reflect the new structure
- No redirects are needed for existing bookmarks
- Navigation hierarchy makes sense from a user perspective
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since we have comprehensive information about the internal documentation links.
Documentation structure changes appear safe
The search results show that all internal links in the documentation are properly structured and follow a consistent pattern. The changes in _meta.json represent a reorganization that:
- Maintains existing URL paths (
/chain/*and/stack/*links are preserved) - Only affects the visual organization/grouping of navigation items
- Does not break any existing internal documentation links
The extensive link analysis confirms this is a safe documentation structure change that won't impact navigation or existing bookmarks.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential broken internal links in markdown files
# Look for links containing the old structure
rg -g '*.md' -g '*.mdx' -i ']\((?:.*/)?(?:chain|stack)/'
Length of output: 23332
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pages/stack/interop/_meta.json (1)
7-7: Consider adding descriptions for better documentation.To improve documentation maintainability, consider adding description fields to provide context about the content structure.
Example enhancement:
- "assets": "Assets" + "assets": { + "title": "Assets", + "description": "Documentation for Superchain assets including ERC20, WETH, and transfer guides" + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
next-env.d.ts(1 hunks)pages/builders/app-developers/_meta.json(0 hunks)pages/builders/app-developers/contracts.mdx(0 hunks)pages/builders/app-developers/contracts/_meta.json(0 hunks)pages/builders/app-developers/contracts/superchain-erc20.mdx(0 hunks)pages/stack/interop/_meta.json(1 hunks)pages/stack/interop/assets/_meta.json(1 hunks)public/_redirects(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
- pages/builders/app-developers/_meta.json
- pages/builders/app-developers/contracts.mdx
- pages/builders/app-developers/contracts/_meta.json
- pages/builders/app-developers/contracts/superchain-erc20.mdx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- next-env.d.ts
- pages/stack/interop/assets/_meta.json
🔇 Additional comments (2)
pages/stack/interop/_meta.json (1)
7-7: LGTM! Verify content relocation.
The consolidation of asset-related entries under a new "assets" section improves the documentation structure.
Let's verify that the removed content has been properly relocated:
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the content of public/_redirects and the other files to verify if they handle the path changes correctly.
Content relocation verified and properly handled
The restructuring is well-managed:
- All removed content exists in the new
/assets/location - Proper redirects are in place for the old paths:
/stack/interop/superchain-erc20→/stack/interop/assets/superchain-erc20/stack/interop/superchain-weth→/stack/interop/assets/superchain-weth/stack/interop/transfer-superchainERC20→/stack/interop/assets/transfer-superchainERC20
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the removed content exists in the new location
# and that there are no broken references to the old paths
# Check if the content exists in the new location
rg -l "SuperchainERC20|SuperchainWETH|transfer.*SuperchainERC20" pages/stack/interop/assets/
# Check for any broken references to old paths
rg -l "stack/interop/(superchain-erc20|superchain-weth|transfer-superchainERC20)"
Length of output: 443
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the redirects file and references in other files
cat public/_redirects
# Check references in the interop pages
rg -A 2 -B 2 "stack/interop/(superchain-erc20|superchain-weth|transfer-superchainERC20)" pages/stack/interop.mdx pages/stack/interop/explainer.mdx
Length of output: 11181
public/_redirects (1)
115-118: Verify target paths exist for new asset documentation redirects.
The redirects look well-structured and maintain consistency with the existing patterns. However, we should ensure the target paths exist to prevent 404 errors.
Let's verify the target paths and check for any circular redirects:
✅ Verification successful
Target paths verified, no circular redirects found
The verification confirms:
- Target documentation files exist at the correct locations:
pages/stack/interop/assets/superchain-erc20.mdxpages/stack/interop/assets/superchain-weth.mdx
- No circular redirects were detected in the target files
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify target paths exist and check for circular redirects
# Test 1: Check if the target documentation files exist
echo "Checking for target documentation files..."
fd -e mdx -e md "superchain-(erc20|weth)" "pages/stack/interop/assets/"
# Test 2: Look for any potential circular redirects
echo "Checking for circular redirects..."
grep -r "assets/superchain" pages/stack/interop/assets/
Length of output: 396
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
pages/stack/interop.mdx (3)
Line range hint
1-6: Improve the frontmatter description for clarity and proper capitalizationThe description should be a clear, concise sentence rather than a list of terms. Additionally, technical terms should be properly capitalized.
--- title: Interop -description: Documentation covering Cross Chain Message, Explainer, Message Passing, Op Supervisor, Superchain Erc20, Superchain Weth, Supersim, Transfer Superchainerc20 in the Interop section of the OP Stack ecosystem. +description: Documentation covering cross-chain messaging, message passing, OP Supervisor, SuperchainERC20, SuperchainWETH, and SuperSim in the Interop section of the OP Stack ecosystem. lang: en-US ---
Line range hint
8-12: Improve the main content descriptionThe content description should be more informative and use proper capitalization for technical terms.
# Interop -Documentation covering Cross Chain Message, Explainer, Message Passing, Op Supervisor, Superchain Erc20, Superchain Weth, Supersim, Transfer Superchainerc20 in the Interop section of the OP Stack ecosystem. +The Interop section provides documentation about cross-chain communication and asset management in the OP Stack ecosystem. Learn about message passing between chains, the OP Supervisor, and various tools for managing cross-chain assets.
Line range hint
14-24: Improve card title capitalization and approve consolidationThe consolidation of asset-related documentation under a single "Cross domain assets" card improves organization. However, some card titles need proper capitalization.
<Cards> - <Card title="Anatomy of a cross-chain message" href="/stack/interop/cross-chain-message" /> + <Card title="Anatomy of a Cross-Chain Message" href="/stack/interop/cross-chain-message" /> - <Card title="Interoperability explainer" href="/stack/interop/explainer" /> + <Card title="Interoperability Explainer" href="/stack/interop/explainer" /> - <Card title="Interop message passing overview" href="/stack/interop/message-passing" /> + <Card title="Interop Message Passing Overview" href="/stack/interop/message-passing" /> <Card title="OP Supervisor" href="/stack/interop/op-supervisor" /> - <Card title="Supersim multichain development environment" href="/stack/interop/supersim" /> + <Card title="SuperSim Multichain Development Environment" href="/stack/interop/supersim" /> - <Card title="Cross domain assets" href="/stack/interop/assets" /> + <Card title="Cross-Domain Assets" href="/stack/interop/assets" /> </Cards>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
pages/stack/interop.mdx(1 hunks)pages/stack/interop/assets.mdx(1 hunks)words.txt(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
pages/stack/interop.mdx (1)
Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
pages/stack/interop/assets.mdx (1)
Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
🪛 LanguageTool
words.txt
[duplication] ~152-~152: Möglicher Tippfehler: ein Wort wird wiederholt
Context: ...OREPRICE ignoreprice implicity Immunefi Inator inator INFLUXDBV influxdbv initcode IPCDISABLE...
(GERMAN_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
[style] ~292-~292: Möchten Sie die modernere Schreibweise „proxid“ verwenden?
Context: ...ze productionized Protip Proxied Proxyd proxyd pseudorandomly Pyth Pyth's QRNG Quickno...
(I_ANSTATT_Y)
[duplication] ~397-~397: Möglicher Tippfehler: ein Wort wird wiederholt
Context: ...le VHOSTS vhosts Viem viem Viem's voxel VMDEBUG vmdebug VMODULE vmodule Warpcast xlarge XORI xt...
(GERMAN_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/stack/interop/assets.mdx (1)
7-7: LGTM!
The import statement is clean and properly structured.
Description