-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 209
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs(interop/architecture): first version #1181
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces changes to the documentation for the interoperability system, focusing on restructuring and expanding the content related to the system's architecture. The modifications involve three primary files:
These changes aim to improve documentation clarity and provide more comprehensive information about the interoperability architecture. Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
pages/stack/interop.mdx (1)
Line range hint
1-13
: Improve the frontmatter description and maintain consistent capitalizationThe description needs refinement:
- Add Oxford commas to the list
- Maintain consistent capitalization of technical terms
- Restructure for better readability
Apply this improvement:
--- title: Interop -description: Documentation covering Cross Chain Message, Explainer, Message Passing, Op Supervisor, Superchain Erc20, Superchain Weth, Supersim, Transfer Superchainerc20 in the Interop section of the OP Stack ecosystem. +description: Documentation covering Cross-Chain Message, Explainer, Message Passing, OP Supervisor, Superchain ERC20, Superchain WETH, SuperSim, and Transfer SuperchainERC20 in the Interop section of the OP Stack ecosystem. lang: en-US ---
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (4)
1-5
: Enhance the metadata descriptionThe current description "How it works" is too vague. Consider expanding it to be more specific and informative, such as "A detailed overview of the OP Stack's interoperability system architecture and components."
16-16
: Replace personal pronoun with proper nounReplace "we expect" with "OP Stack expects" to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
-Interoperability is provided by an [OP Supervisor](./op-supervisor), a new component that we expect every node operator to run in addition to the [rollup node](/builders/node-operators/architecture#rollup-node) and [execution client](/builders/node-operators/architecture#execution-client). +Interoperability is provided by an [OP Supervisor](./op-supervisor), a new component that OP Stack expects every node operator to run in addition to the [rollup node](/builders/node-operators/architecture#rollup-node) and [execution client](/builders/node-operators/architecture#execution-client).
59-59
: Fix typo in sequence diagramThere's a typo in the sequence diagram: "Soucre" should be "Source".
- participant src as Soucre Chain + participant src as Source Chain
83-83
: Add missing comma after CrossL2InboxAdd a comma after the contract name for better readability.
-The transaction that receives the message calls a contract called [`CrossL2Inbox`](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/predeploys.html#crossl2inbox), directly or indirectly. +The transaction that receives the message calls a contract called [`CrossL2Inbox`](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/predeploys.html#crossl2inbox), directly or indirectly.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~83-~83: A punctuation mark might be missing here.
Context: ...ves the message calls a contract called [CrossL2Inbox
](https://specs.optimism.i...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
pages/stack/interop.mdx
(1 hunks)pages/stack/interop/_meta.json
(1 hunks)pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- pages/stack/interop/_meta.json
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
pages/stack/interop.mdx (1)
Pattern **/*.mdx
: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)
Pattern **/*.mdx
: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx
[uncategorized] ~83-~83: A punctuation mark might be missing here.
Context: ...ves the message calls a contract called [CrossL2Inbox
](https://specs.optimism.i...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/stack/interop.mdx (1)
14-17
: Verify the documentation flow after removing the explainer
The replacement of the "Interoperability explainer" with "Architecture" raises some concerns about the documentation flow:
- Is the explainer content merged into the architecture documentation?
- Should the architecture documentation come after a basic introduction to interoperability concepts?
Let's verify the content organization:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify if the explainer content exists elsewhere.
Documentation flow is properly maintained
The explainer content still exists at /stack/interop/explainer
and serves as a comprehensive introduction to interoperability concepts. The architecture documentation complements it by providing technical details about implementation. The current card ordering is logical as:
- The explainer card links to fundamental concepts, definitions, and benefits of interoperability
- The architecture card links to technical implementation details that naturally build upon the basic concepts
Both documents are well-structured and maintain a clear learning path from basic to advanced concepts.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the explainer content exists elsewhere and verify the documentation structure
# Look for any references to the explainer
rg -i "interoperability explainer" --type mdx
# Check if architecture.mdx includes introductory content
fd -e mdx -e md "architecture" --exec head -n 20 {}
Length of output: 3001
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for interoperability-related content in the codebase
rg -g "*.{md,mdx}" -i "interoperability" -B2 -A2
# Check the content of the interop directory
fd . "stack/interop" --type f --exec cat {}
Length of output: 22357
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)
1-5
: Enhance the frontmatter descriptionThe description "How it works" is too brief and generic. Consider expanding it to better reflect the document's content, for example: "A technical overview of the OP Stack chains' interoperability architecture and the OP-Supervisor service."
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx
(1 hunks)words.txt
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)
Pattern **/*.mdx
: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
🪛 LanguageTool
words.txt
[duplication] ~159-~159: Möglicher Tippfehler: ein Wort wird wiederholt
Context: ...nfluxdbv inteoperates interchain intero IPCDISABLE ipcdisable ipcfile IPCPATH ipcpath IPFS ipfs JALR ...
(GERMAN_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
words.txt (1)
158-158
: LGTM: "interchain" is correctly added
The term "interchain" is a valid and commonly used technical term in blockchain interoperability contexts.
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)
141-147
: Uncomment the safety levels definitions
The commented section contains valuable information about safety levels that would enhance the documentation's completeness. Consider incorporating this content into the main documentation.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 5
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)
140-146
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionIncorporate safety level definitions into main content
The commented section contains valuable information about safety levels that should be part of the main documentation.
Consider incorporating these definitions into the safety levels section above to provide a complete understanding of the different states.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (2)
1-5
: Enhance the description for better clarityThe current description "How it works" is too vague. Consider expanding it to be more specific about the architecture being described.
-description: How it works. +description: A technical overview of the OP Stack interoperability architecture and cross-chain messaging system.
48-50
: Fix grammatical issuesAdd missing articles and improve sentence structure.
-OP-Supervisor holds a database +The OP-Supervisor holds a database🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~49-~49: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...ss domain message, and it is the job of OP-Supervisor to validate that the log eve...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)
Pattern **/*.mdx
: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx
[uncategorized] ~49-~49: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...ss domain message, and it is the job of OP-Supervisor to validate that the log eve...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx
[warning] 133-133:
Marker style should be *
[warning] 133-133:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
[warning] 135-135:
Found reference to undefined definition
[warning] 136-136:
Marker style should be *
[warning] 136-136:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
[warning] 137-137:
Marker style should be *
[warning] 137-137:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (4)
1-5
: Enhance frontmatter metadataThe description "How it works" is too generic. Consider expanding it to be more specific about what the document covers.
-description: How it works. +description: A technical overview of the OP Stack interoperability architecture and cross-chain messaging system.
32-33
: Improve diagram contrast and readabilityThe light yellow background (#FFE) might not provide sufficient contrast. Consider using a more neutral color scheme.
- classDef chain fill:#FFE + classDef chain fill:#F5F5F5,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
55-57
: Improve grammar and clarityThere are some grammatical issues and opportunities for improved clarity.
-OP-Supervisor holds a database of all the log events of all the chains in the interoperability cluster. -Every event can potentially initiate a cross domain message, and it is the job of OP-Supervisor to validate that the log event really happened on the source chain. +OP-Supervisor maintains a database of log events from all chains in the interoperability cluster. +Each event can potentially initiate a cross-domain message, and it is the job of the OP-Supervisor to validate that the log event occurred on the source chain.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~56-~56: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...ss domain message, and it is the job of OP-Supervisor to validate that the log eve...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)
146-151
: Fix list formattingThe list formatting needs to be consistent with the documentation style guidelines.
-- Want to learn more? - Read our guide on the anatomy of a [cross-chain message](./cross-chain-message) or check out this - [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes). -- Ready to get started? Use [Supersim](./supersim), a local dev environment that simulates interop for testing applications against a local version of the Superchain. -- For more info about how OP Stack interoperability works under the hood, - [check out the specs](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/overview.html). +* Want to learn more? Read our guide on the anatomy of a [cross-chain message](./cross-chain-message) or check out this [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes) +* Ready to get started? Use [Supersim](./supersim), a local dev environment that simulates interop for testing applications against a local version of the Superchain +* For more info about how OP Stack interoperability works under the hood, [check out the specs](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/overview.html)🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
[warning] 146-146:
Marker style should be*
[warning] 146-146:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
[warning] 149-149:
Marker style should be*
[warning] 149-149:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
[warning] 150-150:
Marker style should be*
[warning] 150-150:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx
(1 hunks)words.txt
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)
Pattern **/*.mdx
: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx
[uncategorized] ~56-~56: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...ss domain message, and it is the job of OP-Supervisor to validate that the log eve...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)
[grammar] ~134-~134: Did you forget to use the plural form here? If not, consider inserting ‘of’ after the determiner ‘all’.
Context: ...he sequencer that produces it, but also all the other sequencer that produce other blocks that are stil...
(ALL_THE_NN)
words.txt
[duplication] ~159-~159: Möglicher Tippfehler: ein Wort wird wiederholt
Context: ...fluxdbv interoperates interchain intero IPCDISABLE ipcdisable ipcfile IPCPATH ipcpath IPFS ipfs JALR ...
(GERMAN_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx
[warning] 146-146:
Marker style should be *
[warning] 146-146:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
[warning] 149-149:
Marker style should be *
[warning] 149-149:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
[warning] 150-150:
Marker style should be *
[warning] 150-150:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
🔇 Additional comments (4)
words.txt (2)
157-157
: LGTM: Valid technical term added
The addition of "interoperates" is appropriate for the interoperability documentation context.
159-159
: Replace "intero" with "interop"
The term "intero" appears to be a typo of "interop", which is the standard abbreviation for interoperability.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[duplication] ~159-~159: Möglicher Tippfehler: ein Wort wird wiederholt
Context: ...fluxdbv interoperates interchain intero IPCDISABLE ipcdisable ipcfile IPCPATH ipcpath IPFS ipfs JALR ...
(GERMAN_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (2)
63-82
: LGTM! Clear and well-structured sequence diagram
The sequence diagram effectively illustrates the cross-domain messaging process and the role of each component.
153-159
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Incorporate safety level definitions into the main content
The commented-out safety level definitions provide valuable information that should be part of the main documentation.
Consider moving these definitions into the main content, structured as follows:
+## Safety level definitions
+
+Blocks in the system can exist in different safety states:
+
+* **Unsafe**: Not yet written to L1, obtained through gossip channels, ultimately based on trust in a sequencer.
+
+* **Cross unsafe**: Verified that all executing messages have legitimate initiating messages, but otherwise still unsafe. Treated as unsafe for most purposes.
+
+* **Safe**: The block and all blocks on which it depends (those with initiating messages to which it has executing messages) have been written to L1.
+
+* **Finalized**: The block and all blocks on which it depends have been on L1 for long enough to make a reorg impossible.
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (3)
1-5
: Enhance the description to be more informativeThe current description "How it works" is too generic. Consider expanding it to better reflect the document's content.
-description: How it works. +description: A technical overview of the OP Stack interoperability architecture and cross-chain messaging system.
18-25
: Remove commented-out codeThis commented-out Mermaid code appears to be unused and should be removed to maintain clean documentation.
90-90
: Make the CrossL2Inbox link more specificThe link to the CrossL2Inbox specification could be more precise by pointing directly to the relevant section.
-[`CrossL2Inbox`](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/predeploys.html#crossl2inbox) +[`CrossL2Inbox` predeployed contract](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/predeploys.html#crossl2inbox)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)
Pattern **/*.mdx
: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx
[grammar] ~132-~132: Did you forget to use the plural form here? If not, consider inserting ‘of’ after the determiner ‘all’.
Context: ...he sequencer that produces it, but also all the other sequencer that produce other blocks that are stil...
(ALL_THE_NN)
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx
[warning] 144-144:
Marker style should be *
[warning] 144-144:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
[warning] 147-147:
Marker style should be *
[warning] 147-147:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
[warning] 148-148:
Marker style should be *
[warning] 148-148:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
🔇 Additional comments (2)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (2)
144-149
:
Fix list formatting
The list formatting needs to be adjusted to follow the style guidelines.
-- Want to learn more?
- Read our guide on the anatomy of a [cross-chain message](./cross-chain-message) or check out this
- [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes).
-- Ready to get started? Use [Supersim](./supersim), a local dev environment that simulates interop for testing applications against a local version of the Superchain.
-- For more info about how OP Stack interoperability works under the hood,
- [check out the specs](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/overview.html).
+* Want to learn more? Read our guide on the anatomy of a [cross-chain message](./cross-chain-message) or check out this [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes)
+* Ready to get started? Use [Supersim](./supersim), a local dev environment that simulates interop for testing applications against a local version of the Superchain
+* For more info about how OP Stack interoperability works under the hood, [check out the specs](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/overview.html)
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
[warning] 144-144:
Marker style should be *
[warning] 144-144:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
[warning] 147-147:
Marker style should be *
[warning] 147-147:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
[warning] 148-148:
Marker style should be *
[warning] 148-148:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
151-157
: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Incorporate safety levels definitions into the main content
The commented-out safety levels definitions provide valuable information that should be part of the main documentation.
Add these definitions after line 96:
+## Safety levels
+
+Blocks in the system can have different safety levels:
+
+* **Unsafe**: Not yet written to L1, obtained through gossip channels, ultimately based on trust in a sequencer.
+* **Cross unsafe**: Verified that all executing messages have legitimate initiating messages, but otherwise still unsafe. Treated as unsafe for most purposes.
+* **Safe**: The block and all the blocks on which it depends (those with initiating messages to which it has executing messages) have been written to L1.
+* **Finalized**: The block and all the blocks on which it depends have been on L1 for long enough to make a reorg impossible.
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (5)
1-5
: Enhance frontmatter metadataThe description "How it works" is too generic. Consider providing a more specific description that outlines the document's purpose and content.
-description: How it works. +description: A technical overview of the OP Stack's interoperability architecture and cross-chain messaging system.
21-21
: Improve diagram contrastThe light yellow background (#FFE) might not provide sufficient contrast. Consider using a slightly darker shade.
- classDef chain fill:#FFE + classDef chain fill:#F8F8E0
14-15
: Maintain consistent capitalization of technical termsEnsure proper nouns are consistently capitalized throughout the document.
-consensus client (e.g. op-node) and an execution client +Consensus Client (e.g., OP Node) and an Execution Client
122-132
: Restructure safety levels explanationThe explanation of safety levels could be more structured for better clarity.
-To trust that an unsafe block is valid and is going to become safe and then finalized, you need to trust not only the sequencer that produces it, but also all the other sequencers that produce other blocks that are still unsafe, but that include initiating messages that are executed in that block. +To trust an unsafe block's validity and its eventual progression to safe and finalized states: +1. Trust the sequencer that produces it +2. Trust all other sequencers that produce blocks containing initiating messages executed in that block + +This expanded trust requirement only applies to: +- Unsafe blocks +- Cases where the sequencer allows processing messages from unsafe blocks
133-140
: Fix list formattingThe list formatting needs to be adjusted to follow the style guidelines.
-## Next steps - -- Want to learn more? - Read our guide on the anatomy of a [cross-chain message](./cross-chain-message) or check out this - [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes). -- Ready to get started? Use [Supersim](./supersim), a local dev environment that simulates interop for testing applications against a local version of the Superchain. -- For more info about how OP Stack interoperability works under the hood, - [check out the specs](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/overview.html). +## Next steps + +* Want to learn more? Read our guide on the anatomy of a [cross-chain message](./cross-chain-message) or check out this [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes) +* Ready to get started? Use [Supersim](./supersim), a local dev environment that simulates interop for testing applications against a local version of the Superchain +* For more info about how OP Stack interoperability works under the hood, [check out the specs](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/overview.html)🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
[warning] 135-135:
Marker style should be*
[warning] 135-135:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
[warning] 138-138:
Marker style should be*
[warning] 138-138:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
[warning] 139-139:
Marker style should be*
[warning] 139-139:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)
Pattern **/*.mdx
: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx
[warning] 135-135:
Marker style should be *
[warning] 135-135:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
[warning] 138-138:
Marker style should be *
[warning] 138-138:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
[warning] 139-139:
Marker style should be *
[warning] 139-139:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)
48-86
: LGTM! Clear and well-documented message flow
The sequence diagram and explanation effectively communicate the cross-domain messaging process. The links to specifications and implementation details provide valuable context.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (7)
1-5
: Enhance the description to be more informativeThe current description "How it works" is quite brief. Consider expanding it to better reflect the document's content and purpose.
-description: How it works. +description: A comprehensive guide to the OP Stack interoperability architecture, explaining how OP-Supervisor enables cross-chain communication.
16-16
: Maintain consistent capitalization of technical termsFor clarity and consistency, technical terms should maintain proper capitalization throughout the document.
-consensus client (e.g. op-node) +consensus client (e.g. OP Node)
22-23
: Improve diagram contrast for better readabilityThe current light yellow background (#FFE) might not provide sufficient contrast. Consider using a slightly darker background color.
- classDef chain fill:#FFE + classDef chain fill:#F8F8E0,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
80-80
: Fix typo in word "interoperates"-Any log event on any chain that inteoperates with the destination can initiate a cross domain message. +Any log event on any chain that interoperates with the destination can initiate a cross domain message.
82-84
: Improve clarity of CrossL2Inbox explanationThe explanation of how transactions interact with CrossL2Inbox could be structured more clearly.
-The transaction that receives the message on the destination chain calls a contract called [`CrossL2Inbox`](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/predeploys.html#crossl2inbox). -This call can be at the top level, directly from the externally owned account, or come through a smart contract. +On the destination chain, the receiving transaction interacts with the [`CrossL2Inbox`](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/predeploys.html#crossl2inbox) contract in one of two ways: +1. Direct call from an externally owned account +2. Indirect call through another smart contract
123-124
: Consider adding a summary table of safety levelsTo enhance understanding, consider adding a table that summarizes the different safety levels and their implications.
Add this table after the explanation:
| Safety Level | Description | Trust Requirements | |--------------|-------------|-------------------| | Unsafe | Not yet written to L1 | Trust all sequencers involved | | Safe | Written to L1, all dependencies are safe | Standard L1 trust assumptions | | Finalized | Immune from reorgs | Highest security level |
136-141
: Fix formatting of bullet points and linksThe bullet points and links have inconsistent formatting and unnecessary line breaks.
-* Want to learn more? - Read our guide on the anatomy of a [cross-chain message](./cross-chain-message) or check out this - [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes). -* Ready to get started? Use [Supersim](./supersim), a local dev environment that simulates interop for testing applications against a local version of the Superchain. -* For more info about how OP Stack interoperability works under the hood, - [check out the specs](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/overview.html). +* Want to learn more? Read our guide on the anatomy of a [cross-chain message](./cross-chain-message) or check out this [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes) +* Ready to get started? Use [Supersim](./supersim), a local dev environment that simulates interop for testing applications against a local version of the Superchain +* For more info about how OP Stack interoperability works under the hood, [check out the specs](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/overview.html)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx
(1 hunks)words.txt
(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- words.txt
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)
Pattern **/*.mdx
: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks great! Just added a few small request, great job! Feel free to ping me directly once ready for a review
No description provided.