Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(interop/architecture): first version #1181

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Dec 24, 2024

Conversation

qbzzt
Copy link
Contributor

@qbzzt qbzzt commented Dec 15, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 15, 2024

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 7c01e6d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/67662dc984fbad0008c90236
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1181--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@qbzzt qbzzt marked this pull request as ready for review December 18, 2024 00:08
@qbzzt qbzzt requested a review from a team as a code owner December 18, 2024 00:08
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 18, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the documentation for the interoperability system, focusing on restructuring and expanding the content related to the system's architecture. The modifications involve three primary files:

  1. In pages/stack/interop.mdx, a card for "Interoperability explainer" is removed and replaced with a new "Architecture" card, adjusting the navigation structure.
  2. The pages/stack/interop/_meta.json file is updated to include a new metadata entry for the "architecture" section, ensuring proper routing and display of the new content.
  3. A new file pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx is created, providing an in-depth explanation of the interoperability architecture. This document details the OP Supervisor's role, cross-domain messaging processes, and the safety levels of blocks in the system.

These changes aim to improve documentation clarity and provide more comprehensive information about the interoperability architecture.

Possibly related PRs

  • 3 new node pages #679: This PR introduces a new architecture page and updates related metadata, which aligns with the changes made in the main PR regarding the addition of the "Architecture" card and the new metadata key in _meta.json.
  • op-deployer + opcm documentation #934: This PR includes updates to the _meta.json files and introduces documentation for the op-deployer, which relates to the overall architecture and deployment context of the OP Stack, similar to the changes in the main PR.
  • supersim explainer #978: This PR updates the "Interoperability Explainer," which is closely related to the changes in the main PR regarding the interop documentation and the addition of the "Architecture" card.
  • superchainERC20 #986: This PR adds the SuperchainERC20 Token Standard, which is relevant to interoperability and architecture discussions within the OP Stack, aligning with the main PR's focus on interop documentation.
  • Op deployer updates #1020: This PR updates the op-deployer documentation, which is relevant as it relates to the deployment aspects of the OP Stack architecture discussed in the main PR.

Suggested labels

flag:merge-pending-release

Suggested reviewers

  • cpengilly
  • sbvegan
  • bradleycamacho

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 837903c and 7c01e6d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
pages/stack/interop.mdx (1)

Line range hint 1-13: Improve the frontmatter description and maintain consistent capitalization

The description needs refinement:

  1. Add Oxford commas to the list
  2. Maintain consistent capitalization of technical terms
  3. Restructure for better readability

Apply this improvement:

---
title: Interop
-description: Documentation covering Cross Chain Message, Explainer, Message Passing, Op Supervisor, Superchain Erc20, Superchain Weth, Supersim, Transfer Superchainerc20 in the Interop section of the OP Stack ecosystem.
+description: Documentation covering Cross-Chain Message, Explainer, Message Passing, OP Supervisor, Superchain ERC20, Superchain WETH, SuperSim, and Transfer SuperchainERC20 in the Interop section of the OP Stack ecosystem.
lang: en-US
---
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (4)

1-5: Enhance the metadata description

The current description "How it works" is too vague. Consider expanding it to be more specific and informative, such as "A detailed overview of the OP Stack's interoperability system architecture and components."


16-16: Replace personal pronoun with proper noun

Replace "we expect" with "OP Stack expects" to maintain consistency in communal documentation.

-Interoperability is provided by an [OP Supervisor](./op-supervisor), a new component that we expect every node operator to run in addition to the [rollup node](/builders/node-operators/architecture#rollup-node) and [execution client](/builders/node-operators/architecture#execution-client).
+Interoperability is provided by an [OP Supervisor](./op-supervisor), a new component that OP Stack expects every node operator to run in addition to the [rollup node](/builders/node-operators/architecture#rollup-node) and [execution client](/builders/node-operators/architecture#execution-client).

59-59: Fix typo in sequence diagram

There's a typo in the sequence diagram: "Soucre" should be "Source".

-    participant src as Soucre Chain
+    participant src as Source Chain

83-83: Add missing comma after CrossL2Inbox

Add a comma after the contract name for better readability.

-The transaction that receives the message calls a contract called [`CrossL2Inbox`](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/predeploys.html#crossl2inbox), directly or indirectly.
+The transaction that receives the message calls a contract called [`CrossL2Inbox`](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/predeploys.html#crossl2inbox), directly or indirectly.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~83-~83: A punctuation mark might be missing here.
Context: ...ves the message calls a contract called [CrossL2Inbox](https://specs.optimism.i...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bb16a41 and 629499d.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • pages/stack/interop.mdx (1 hunks)
  • pages/stack/interop/_meta.json (1 hunks)
  • pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • pages/stack/interop/_meta.json
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
pages/stack/interop.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx

[uncategorized] ~83-~83: A punctuation mark might be missing here.
Context: ...ves the message calls a contract called [CrossL2Inbox](https://specs.optimism.i...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/stack/interop.mdx (1)

14-17: Verify the documentation flow after removing the explainer

The replacement of the "Interoperability explainer" with "Architecture" raises some concerns about the documentation flow:

  1. Is the explainer content merged into the architecture documentation?
  2. Should the architecture documentation come after a basic introduction to interoperability concepts?

Let's verify the content organization:

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information to verify if the explainer content exists elsewhere.


Documentation flow is properly maintained

The explainer content still exists at /stack/interop/explainer and serves as a comprehensive introduction to interoperability concepts. The architecture documentation complements it by providing technical details about implementation. The current card ordering is logical as:

  1. The explainer card links to fundamental concepts, definitions, and benefits of interoperability
  2. The architecture card links to technical implementation details that naturally build upon the basic concepts

Both documents are well-structured and maintain a clear learning path from basic to advanced concepts.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the explainer content exists elsewhere and verify the documentation structure

# Look for any references to the explainer
rg -i "interoperability explainer" --type mdx

# Check if architecture.mdx includes introductory content
fd -e mdx -e md "architecture" --exec head -n 20 {}

Length of output: 3001


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for interoperability-related content in the codebase
rg -g "*.{md,mdx}" -i "interoperability" -B2 -A2

# Check the content of the interop directory
fd . "stack/interop" --type f --exec cat {}

Length of output: 22357

pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 7

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)

1-5: Enhance the frontmatter description

The description "How it works" is too brief and generic. Consider expanding it to better reflect the document's content, for example: "A technical overview of the OP Stack chains' interoperability architecture and the OP-Supervisor service."

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4bdc653 and 85ddb8f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1 hunks)
  • words.txt (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
🪛 LanguageTool
words.txt

[duplication] ~159-~159: Möglicher Tippfehler: ein Wort wird wiederholt
Context: ...nfluxdbv inteoperates interchain intero IPCDISABLE ipcdisable ipcfile IPCPATH ipcpath IPFS ipfs JALR ...

(GERMAN_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
words.txt (1)

158-158: LGTM: "interchain" is correctly added

The term "interchain" is a valid and commonly used technical term in blockchain interoperability contexts.

pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)

141-147: Uncomment the safety levels definitions

The commented section contains valuable information about safety levels that would enhance the documentation's completeness. Consider incorporating this content into the main documentation.

words.txt Show resolved Hide resolved
words.txt Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
qbzzt and others added 2 commits December 18, 2024 16:16
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)

140-146: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Incorporate safety level definitions into main content

The commented section contains valuable information about safety levels that should be part of the main documentation.

Consider incorporating these definitions into the safety levels section above to provide a complete understanding of the different states.

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (2)

1-5: Enhance the description for better clarity

The current description "How it works" is too vague. Consider expanding it to be more specific about the architecture being described.

-description: How it works.
+description: A technical overview of the OP Stack interoperability architecture and cross-chain messaging system.

48-50: Fix grammatical issues

Add missing articles and improve sentence structure.

-OP-Supervisor holds a database
+The OP-Supervisor holds a database
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~49-~49: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...ss domain message, and it is the job of OP-Supervisor to validate that the log eve...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 85ddb8f and fb424dc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx

[uncategorized] ~49-~49: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...ss domain message, and it is the job of OP-Supervisor to validate that the log eve...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)

🪛 GitHub Check: lint
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx

[warning] 133-133:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 133-133:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 135-135:
Found reference to undefined definition


[warning] 136-136:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 136-136:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 137-137:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 137-137:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces

pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
qbzzt and others added 2 commits December 18, 2024 16:23
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@qbzzt qbzzt requested a review from zainbacchus December 18, 2024 23:47
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (4)

1-5: Enhance frontmatter metadata

The description "How it works" is too generic. Consider expanding it to be more specific about what the document covers.

-description: How it works.
+description: A technical overview of the OP Stack interoperability architecture and cross-chain messaging system.

32-33: Improve diagram contrast and readability

The light yellow background (#FFE) might not provide sufficient contrast. Consider using a more neutral color scheme.

-  classDef chain fill:#FFE
+  classDef chain fill:#F5F5F5,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px

55-57: Improve grammar and clarity

There are some grammatical issues and opportunities for improved clarity.

-OP-Supervisor holds a database of all the log events of all the chains in the interoperability cluster.
-Every event can potentially initiate a cross domain message, and it is the job of OP-Supervisor to validate that the log event really happened on the source chain.
+OP-Supervisor maintains a database of log events from all chains in the interoperability cluster.
+Each event can potentially initiate a cross-domain message, and it is the job of the OP-Supervisor to validate that the log event occurred on the source chain.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~56-~56: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...ss domain message, and it is the job of OP-Supervisor to validate that the log eve...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)


146-151: Fix list formatting

The list formatting needs to be consistent with the documentation style guidelines.

-- Want to learn more? 
-  Read our guide on the anatomy of a [cross-chain message](./cross-chain-message) or check out this 
-  [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes).
-- Ready to get started? Use [Supersim](./supersim), a local dev environment that simulates interop for testing applications against a local version of the Superchain.
-- For more info about how OP Stack interoperability works under the hood, 
-  [check out the specs](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/overview.html).
+* Want to learn more? Read our guide on the anatomy of a [cross-chain message](./cross-chain-message) or check out this [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes)
+* Ready to get started? Use [Supersim](./supersim), a local dev environment that simulates interop for testing applications against a local version of the Superchain
+* For more info about how OP Stack interoperability works under the hood, [check out the specs](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/overview.html)
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint

[warning] 146-146:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 146-146:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 149-149:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 149-149:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 150-150:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 150-150:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fb424dc and 28341d2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1 hunks)
  • words.txt (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx

[uncategorized] ~56-~56: Possible missing article found.
Context: ...ss domain message, and it is the job of OP-Supervisor to validate that the log eve...

(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_THE)


[grammar] ~134-~134: Did you forget to use the plural form here? If not, consider inserting ‘of’ after the determiner ‘all’.
Context: ...he sequencer that produces it, but also all the other sequencer that produce other blocks that are stil...

(ALL_THE_NN)

words.txt

[duplication] ~159-~159: Möglicher Tippfehler: ein Wort wird wiederholt
Context: ...fluxdbv interoperates interchain intero IPCDISABLE ipcdisable ipcfile IPCPATH ipcpath IPFS ipfs JALR ...

(GERMAN_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)

🪛 GitHub Check: lint
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx

[warning] 146-146:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 146-146:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 149-149:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 149-149:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 150-150:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 150-150:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces

🔇 Additional comments (4)
words.txt (2)

157-157: LGTM: Valid technical term added

The addition of "interoperates" is appropriate for the interoperability documentation context.


159-159: Replace "intero" with "interop"

The term "intero" appears to be a typo of "interop", which is the standard abbreviation for interoperability.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[duplication] ~159-~159: Möglicher Tippfehler: ein Wort wird wiederholt
Context: ...fluxdbv interoperates interchain intero IPCDISABLE ipcdisable ipcfile IPCPATH ipcpath IPFS ipfs JALR ...

(GERMAN_WORD_REPEAT_RULE)

pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (2)

63-82: LGTM! Clear and well-structured sequence diagram

The sequence diagram effectively illustrates the cross-domain messaging process and the role of each component.


153-159: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Incorporate safety level definitions into the main content

The commented-out safety level definitions provide valuable information that should be part of the main documentation.

Consider moving these definitions into the main content, structured as follows:

+## Safety level definitions
+
+Blocks in the system can exist in different safety states:
+
+* **Unsafe**: Not yet written to L1, obtained through gossip channels, ultimately based on trust in a sequencer.
+
+* **Cross unsafe**: Verified that all executing messages have legitimate initiating messages, but otherwise still unsafe. Treated as unsafe for most purposes.
+
+* **Safe**: The block and all blocks on which it depends (those with initiating messages to which it has executing messages) have been written to L1.
+
+* **Finalized**: The block and all blocks on which it depends have been on L1 for long enough to make a reorg impossible.

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (3)

1-5: Enhance the description to be more informative

The current description "How it works" is too generic. Consider expanding it to better reflect the document's content.

-description: How it works.
+description: A technical overview of the OP Stack interoperability architecture and cross-chain messaging system.

18-25: Remove commented-out code

This commented-out Mermaid code appears to be unused and should be removed to maintain clean documentation.


90-90: Make the CrossL2Inbox link more specific

The link to the CrossL2Inbox specification could be more precise by pointing directly to the relevant section.

-[`CrossL2Inbox`](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/predeploys.html#crossl2inbox)
+[`CrossL2Inbox` predeployed contract](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/predeploys.html#crossl2inbox)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 28341d2 and 95ab156.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx

[grammar] ~132-~132: Did you forget to use the plural form here? If not, consider inserting ‘of’ after the determiner ‘all’.
Context: ...he sequencer that produces it, but also all the other sequencer that produce other blocks that are stil...

(ALL_THE_NN)

🪛 GitHub Check: lint
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx

[warning] 144-144:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 144-144:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 147-147:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 147-147:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 148-148:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 148-148:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces

🔇 Additional comments (2)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (2)

144-149: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix list formatting

The list formatting needs to be adjusted to follow the style guidelines.

-- Want to learn more? 
-  Read our guide on the anatomy of a [cross-chain message](./cross-chain-message) or check out this 
-  [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes).
-- Ready to get started? Use [Supersim](./supersim), a local dev environment that simulates interop for testing applications against a local version of the Superchain.
-- For more info about how OP Stack interoperability works under the hood, 
-  [check out the specs](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/overview.html).
+* Want to learn more? Read our guide on the anatomy of a [cross-chain message](./cross-chain-message) or check out this [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes)
+* Ready to get started? Use [Supersim](./supersim), a local dev environment that simulates interop for testing applications against a local version of the Superchain
+* For more info about how OP Stack interoperability works under the hood, [check out the specs](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/overview.html)

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint

[warning] 144-144:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 144-144:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 147-147:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 147-147:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 148-148:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 148-148:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


151-157: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Incorporate safety levels definitions into the main content

The commented-out safety levels definitions provide valuable information that should be part of the main documentation.

Add these definitions after line 96:

+## Safety levels
+
+Blocks in the system can have different safety levels:
+
+* **Unsafe**: Not yet written to L1, obtained through gossip channels, ultimately based on trust in a sequencer.
+* **Cross unsafe**: Verified that all executing messages have legitimate initiating messages, but otherwise still unsafe. Treated as unsafe for most purposes.
+* **Safe**: The block and all the blocks on which it depends (those with initiating messages to which it has executing messages) have been written to L1.
+* **Finalized**: The block and all the blocks on which it depends have been on L1 for long enough to make a reorg impossible.

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (5)

1-5: Enhance frontmatter metadata

The description "How it works" is too generic. Consider providing a more specific description that outlines the document's purpose and content.

-description: How it works.
+description: A technical overview of the OP Stack's interoperability architecture and cross-chain messaging system.

21-21: Improve diagram contrast

The light yellow background (#FFE) might not provide sufficient contrast. Consider using a slightly darker shade.

-  classDef chain fill:#FFE
+  classDef chain fill:#F8F8E0

14-15: Maintain consistent capitalization of technical terms

Ensure proper nouns are consistently capitalized throughout the document.

-consensus client (e.g. op-node) and an execution client
+Consensus Client (e.g., OP Node) and an Execution Client

122-132: Restructure safety levels explanation

The explanation of safety levels could be more structured for better clarity.

-To trust that an unsafe block is valid and is going to become safe and then finalized, you need to trust not only the sequencer that produces it, but also all the other sequencers that produce other blocks that are still unsafe, but that include initiating messages that are executed in that block.
+To trust an unsafe block's validity and its eventual progression to safe and finalized states:
+1. Trust the sequencer that produces it
+2. Trust all other sequencers that produce blocks containing initiating messages executed in that block
+
+This expanded trust requirement only applies to:
+- Unsafe blocks
+- Cases where the sequencer allows processing messages from unsafe blocks

133-140: Fix list formatting

The list formatting needs to be adjusted to follow the style guidelines.

-## Next steps
-
-- Want to learn more? 
-  Read our guide on the anatomy of a [cross-chain message](./cross-chain-message) or check out this 
-  [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes).
-- Ready to get started? Use [Supersim](./supersim), a local dev environment that simulates interop for testing applications against a local version of the Superchain.
-- For more info about how OP Stack interoperability works under the hood, 
-  [check out the specs](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/overview.html).
+## Next steps
+
+* Want to learn more? Read our guide on the anatomy of a [cross-chain message](./cross-chain-message) or check out this [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes)
+* Ready to get started? Use [Supersim](./supersim), a local dev environment that simulates interop for testing applications against a local version of the Superchain
+* For more info about how OP Stack interoperability works under the hood, [check out the specs](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/overview.html)
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: lint

[warning] 135-135:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 135-135:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 138-138:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 138-138:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 139-139:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 139-139:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 95ab156 and 1b933e9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
🪛 GitHub Check: lint
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx

[warning] 135-135:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 135-135:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 138-138:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 138-138:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces


[warning] 139-139:
Marker style should be *


[warning] 139-139:
Incorrect list-item indent: add 2 spaces

🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)

48-86: LGTM! Clear and well-documented message flow

The sequence diagram and explanation effectively communicate the cross-domain messaging process. The links to specifications and implementation details provide valuable context.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (7)

1-5: Enhance the description to be more informative

The current description "How it works" is quite brief. Consider expanding it to better reflect the document's content and purpose.

-description: How it works.
+description: A comprehensive guide to the OP Stack interoperability architecture, explaining how OP-Supervisor enables cross-chain communication.

16-16: Maintain consistent capitalization of technical terms

For clarity and consistency, technical terms should maintain proper capitalization throughout the document.

-consensus client (e.g. op-node)
+consensus client (e.g. OP Node)

22-23: Improve diagram contrast for better readability

The current light yellow background (#FFE) might not provide sufficient contrast. Consider using a slightly darker background color.

-  classDef chain fill:#FFE
+  classDef chain fill:#F8F8E0,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px

80-80: Fix typo in word "interoperates"

-Any log event on any chain that inteoperates with the destination can initiate a cross domain message.
+Any log event on any chain that interoperates with the destination can initiate a cross domain message.

82-84: Improve clarity of CrossL2Inbox explanation

The explanation of how transactions interact with CrossL2Inbox could be structured more clearly.

-The transaction that receives the message on the destination chain calls a contract called [`CrossL2Inbox`](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/predeploys.html#crossl2inbox).
-This call can be at the top level, directly from the externally owned account, or come through a smart contract.
+On the destination chain, the receiving transaction interacts with the [`CrossL2Inbox`](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/predeploys.html#crossl2inbox) contract in one of two ways:
+1. Direct call from an externally owned account
+2. Indirect call through another smart contract

123-124: Consider adding a summary table of safety levels

To enhance understanding, consider adding a table that summarizes the different safety levels and their implications.

Add this table after the explanation:

| Safety Level | Description | Trust Requirements |
|--------------|-------------|-------------------|
| Unsafe | Not yet written to L1 | Trust all sequencers involved |
| Safe | Written to L1, all dependencies are safe | Standard L1 trust assumptions |
| Finalized | Immune from reorgs | Highest security level |

136-141: Fix formatting of bullet points and links

The bullet points and links have inconsistent formatting and unnecessary line breaks.

-*   Want to learn more?
-    Read our guide on the anatomy of a [cross-chain message](./cross-chain-message) or check out this
-    [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes).
-*   Ready to get started? Use [Supersim](./supersim), a local dev environment that simulates interop for testing applications against a local version of the Superchain.
-*   For more info about how OP Stack interoperability works under the hood,
-    [check out the specs](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/overview.html).
+* Want to learn more? Read our guide on the anatomy of a [cross-chain message](./cross-chain-message) or check out this [interop design video walk-thru](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKc5RgjtGes)
+* Ready to get started? Use [Supersim](./supersim), a local dev environment that simulates interop for testing applications against a local version of the Superchain
+* For more info about how OP Stack interoperability works under the hood, [check out the specs](https://specs.optimism.io/interop/overview.html)
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1b933e9 and 837903c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1 hunks)
  • words.txt (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • words.txt
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "

Copy link
Member

@bradleycamacho bradleycamacho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks great! Just added a few small request, great job! Feel free to ping me directly once ready for a review

pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pages/stack/interop/architecture.mdx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@qbzzt qbzzt requested a review from bradleycamacho December 21, 2024 02:58
@sbvegan sbvegan merged commit 29c9256 into ethereum-optimism:main Dec 24, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants