-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhance module api #286
Enhance module api #286
Conversation
381b59e
to
128b6ae
Compare
51d5c0c
to
15dba1d
Compare
b29a945
to
06e069c
Compare
15dba1d
to
32b3e5c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like this change in general! Having a trait is so much cleaner than having the Module
struct. Left some nit comments, but I will give it a second look soon.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have no other comments than my previous nits, the code looks good to me.
I could re-review after we get #288 merged, but overall I like the direction and I don't think I'm going to have any not nitpicky remarks.
771062d
to
188bcf6
Compare
188bcf6
to
c1bc87b
Compare
bba73bf
to
4444b59
Compare
c641e9a
to
dc567af
Compare
Closed in favor of #313 because this PR was impossible to merge due to Github Issue https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/27521 |
Enhance module api
New features:
ref: #157