-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support KFAC for >2d model outputs #62
Conversation
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 7488467997
💛 - Coveralls |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Still need to take a look at the test files but feel free to start discussing the points.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also had a look at the tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please go ahead and squash-merge after addressing or arguing against my remaining comment. Looks great!
Resolves #60.
This implements K-FAC-expand for linear layers with >2d inputs. Will address #50 in a follow-up PR. Also, I already added the
loss_average
keyword for the correct scaling of the gradient covariance.