Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 9, 2023. It is now read-only.

Add Additional gRPC service handler hook #620

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

katrogan
Copy link
Contributor

@katrogan katrogan commented Oct 3, 2023

TL;DR

Extends the plugin registry with a configurable gPRC service handler hook to serve additional endpoints on the flyteadmin gRPC server.

Type

  • Bug Fix
  • Feature
  • Plugin

Are all requirements met?

  • Code completed
  • Smoke tested
  • Unit tests added
  • Code documentation added
  • Any pending items have an associated Issue

Complete description

^^^

Tracking Issue

N/A

Follow-up issue

NA

Signed-off-by: Katrina Rogan <katroganGH@gmail.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 3, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (fbdb162) 59.05% compared to head (c832e7b) 60.65%.

❗ Current head c832e7b differs from pull request most recent head e9aa342. Consider uploading reports for the commit e9aa342 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #620      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   59.05%   60.65%   +1.59%     
==========================================
  Files         171      171              
  Lines       16499    13469    -3030     
==========================================
- Hits         9743     8169    -1574     
+ Misses       5905     4449    -1456     
  Partials      851      851              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
plugins/registry.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 157 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@pmahindrakar-oss pmahindrakar-oss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@katrogan can you may be add an example for the community on why would somebody try to do this extension . May be through some usecases which can be done in OSS

@katrogan
Copy link
Contributor Author

katrogan commented Oct 3, 2023

@pmahindrakar-oss sure I can save that for a follow-up

btw the monorepo is being finalized today - so I will need to add a duplicate PR there once we've cut over exclusively, but thanks for the review

@katrogan
Copy link
Contributor Author

katrogan commented Oct 4, 2023

closing in favor of flyteorg/flyte#4171

@katrogan katrogan closed this Oct 4, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants