Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: StringT: re-support other string encodings #62
fix: StringT: re-support other string encodings #62
Changes from all commits
fcf7d64
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be nice if the consumer could be warned of the unknown encoding, but not sure that there is facility for that.
Note that the pattern of throwing on an unknown encoding is a pattern copied from existing code in this same module, specifically in
StringT.byteLength()
:restructure/src/String.js
Lines 150 to 151 in fcf7d64
So is there a latent issue in
byteLength()
that may bite future users? I would assume that it does not need to be addressed as urgently as this.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
^ the throw may have only been on encode() or bytelength() before, which is a more restricted set of encodings.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
x-mac-roman
is actually a known encoding, as well, it's handled by the underlying encoder. So one thing that could be done is to expand the set of encodings here to be exhaustive.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
AFAIK this PR brings back the previous behavior which is good enough. Lets do the minimal changes, unless there's a reproduction with an actual bug